Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 3. OTHERWISE"
Results 121 - 140
of 636
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 5:30 am
The district court, once again remanded the case to state court, stating that when an action was initiated after the filing of a Chapter 11 petition, in violation of the accompanying stay, removal was not available. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 4:03 am
The Court of Appeals then begins its analysis of the parties’ respective arguments, noting, initially, that [Patrick F.] [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am
Maintaining secrecy is also key to preventing district courts from creating additional exceptions to grand jury secrecy—since a district court first claimed inherent authority to disclose grand jury material in In re Petition of Kutler, the court explains, there have been a steady stream of requests for disclosures. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 5:35 am
College, 955 F.2d 924, 927-28 (4th Cir.1992) (applying a variant of the first-served rule that allows new defendants thirty days to join an "otherwise valid" petition for removal). [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 10:51 pm
College, 955 F.2d 924, 927-28 (4th Cir.1992) (applying a variant of the first-served rule that allows new defendants thirty days to join an "otherwise valid" petition for removal). [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 2:29 pm
The Seventh Circuit initially stated that it did not know why the court thought it had authority to order Mary, a free adult citizen, to go to Ireland. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
Foster and he had not been otherwise regularly associated together or law partners in any firm. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:52 pm
The Florida Supreme Court has approved the ballot language by a vote of 4 to 3. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:47 am
BTW, if you’re not sure how s [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:01 pm
Otherwise there would be no need for the President’s right of referral. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:08 am
But, it would be very difficult to give a finding that the petition is not maintainable at the initial stage itself and in most of the cases, the Company Law Board will keep the matter pending for final disposal and it may restrain granting any ‘interim orders’ except interim orders requiring transparency in the functioning of the Company. 3. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 8:26 am
” In re Marriage of Wendy W., 2022 IL App (1st) 201000 To do otherwise would be a violation of The Confidentiality Act…which is a crime. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:29 am
On August 13, 2014, Frank filed his Hague petition with this court. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 8:05 am
” 735 ILCS 5/2-619(a)(3) (I believe that both petitions for order of protection should be heard and the subsequent petition for order of protection should be treated as a counter-petition but I would be remiss if I did not suggest a motion to dismiss) If you already have an order of protection and the opposing side files a petition for an order of protection, file a motion to dismiss based on the fact that this issue has already been heard and… [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
If you are wondering why courts often use initials to identify the juveniles who are involved in cases before a particular court, the reason is to try to avoid publicity concerning the juvenile’s encounter(s) with the criminal justice system. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:40 am
Counsel for the party who initiates the dissolution is required to submit a brief signed statement justifying the Commercial Division designation. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 6:07 pm
Otherwise, one is not habitually residing; one is away for a temporary absence of long or short duration. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:56 am
Following the Ninth Circuit's lead, see In re B. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
3. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:09 pm
§ 201.40(b)(3). [read post]
