Search for: "In re Interest of A.C."
Results 21 - 40
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2010, 5:04 am
Customs and Excise Commissioners, [1974] A.C. 133 (H.L.) [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 1:27 pm
Controller A.C. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
Consejo Regulador del Tequila, A.C., 121 USPQ2d 1477 (TTAB 2017) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Karen Kuhlke). [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:25 am
(“Stepfather”) sought to adopt A.C.B., the minor child of his wife, A.C. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:54 am
Darbishire, [1920] A.C. 581, 604 (P.C.)); see also Davis, 1 F.3d at 609; In re Feldberg, 862 F.2d 622, 625 (7th Cir.1988). [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 11:39 am
The re-constituted Board had refused to buy the petitioners’ shares when called upon to do so. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In the Matter of A.C. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
Cir. 1994) (en banc) A.C. [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:11 am
She sought to be re-housed by Wycombe District Council, who told her that she would not be re-housed whilst she held a tenancy with Dacorum. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 11:15 am
Pollak [1927] A.C. 732 (H.L.), at p. 776.) [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
In last month’s case (Dhindsa (Re)) the applicant was injured in a 2010 hit and run collision. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 4:01 am
Bell Telephone Co. of Canada(1904), [1905] A.C. 52, [1905] 1 Olmsted 505, Régie des services publics c. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 7:59 am
Scott, [1913] A.C. 417 (H.L.), at p. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Court Upholds Removal of Child From Parents, Related to Child's Transgender Identity
21 Oct 2022, 3:45 pm
From In the Matter of A.C., decided today by the Indiana Court of Appeals (Judge Terry Crone, joined by Judges Nancy Vaidik and Robert Altice): M.C. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 6:44 pm
Pollak, [1927] A.C. 732 (H.L.), at p. 776.) [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Snider [1925] A.C. 396 per Viscount Haldane), or, as Justice Jean Beetz put it, “a national emergency of the same significance as war, pestilence or insurrection”—including (and Beetz J. here dissented) double-digit inflation (Reference re Anti-Inflation Act, [1976] 2 S.C.R. 373). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:05 am
The English judiciary had and has very little interest—maybe no interest—in it. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:54 am
If so apply “the ultimate balancing test” which has four elements identified by Lord Steyn (in Re S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 A.C. 593 at para 17): “First, neither article [8 or 10] has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:06 am
In re H (A Minor) (Abduction: Rights of Custody), [2000] 2 A.C. 291, 1999 WL 1319095 (appeal taken from Eng.); see Fawcett v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 7:18 am
"Obviously there are differences of opinion about the value," said A.C. [read post]
