Search for: "In re J. G." Results 1 - 20 of 2,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In contrast thereto, decision J 4/11 could not apply, as that decision dealt with a case where the application was “deemed to be withdrawn” rather than withdrawn by the appellant.[1] The Board agrees with the appellant that the starting point of the legal analysis should be decision G 1/09. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 9:00 am by Dan Ernst
  I'm not sure I recommend dashing over to it from the ASLH's welcome reception at GW Law, but we're reposting anyway. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 2:19 pm
The BIA today issued an interim decision in In re A-M-E J-G-U-, 24 IN Dec. 69 (BIA 2007). [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am by Nico Cordes
In proceedings before the EPO, re-establishment of rights under Article 122 EPC is ruled out in respect of the period under Rule 49ter.2(b)(i) PCT for filing a request for restoration of a right of priority. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am by Nico Cordes
In proceedings before the EPO, re-establishment of rights under Article 122 EPC is ruled out in respect of the period under Rule 49ter.2(b)(i) PCT for filing a request for restoration of a right of priority. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:02 pm
H.S.E., G. and An Bord Uchtala[2006] IEHC 278High Court, MacMenamin J., 15 September 2006A reminder of news coverage:Landmark ruling gives custody to adopters[www.ireland.com]High Court turns down adoption application[www.rte.ie]Couple lose daughter in tug-of-love ruling[www.unison.ie] [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:05 pm by Mathew Reisig
If you’re convicted of violating 2C:39-10(g), you’ll be sentenced to prison for three to five years, but unlike most crimes of the third degree in New Jersey, the statute explicitly rules out the normal presumption of non-incarceration. [read post]
17 Sep 2006, 7:27 am
H.S.E., G. and An Bord Uchtala,High Court, MacMenamin J., 15 September 2006:[www.ireland.com]Sample news coverage:Landmark ruling gives custody to adopters[www.ireland.com]High Court turns down adoption application[www.rte.ie]Couple lose daughter in tug-of-love ruling[www.unison.ie]There's nothing yet on the official courts service website:[www.courts.ie]Maybe a proper version will appear there in the next few days. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 10:00 am
J & G Realty, LLC (Breach of fiduciary duty; claim that trial court erred by disposing of plaintiff's breach of fiduciary duty claims on basis of res judicata; claim that trial court erred in finding that plaintiff lacked standing to bring claims for breach of fiduciary duty in her own name; appellate mootness) [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 10:50 am by Kate Fort
Now that the decision in out in In re Z.J.G., I feel like I can write about the reason this case was so important–beyond what I would consider the obvious (parent’s testimony), which I detailed in this post here. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 12:58 am by sylvain
Le Règlement général sur la protection des données (RGPD) est entré en vigueur il y a plus de deux ans et nous en avons déjà beaucoup parlé. [read post]