Search for: "In re J.C. and S.D."
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2014, 7:26 am
J.C. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:38 am
(Case No. 4:2010-cv-00462 (S.D. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 8:34 am
J.C. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Full disclosure: Reed Smith is involved in Caplinger, so consider this entry a non-RS post.In re Celexa & Lexapro Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation, 779 F.3d 34 (1st Cir. 2015). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
We lawyers have to keep such secrets about people as part of our jobs, but we're used to it, and we're handsomely compensated for it. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
This may be a reason why such mutual pseudonymity is so rare.[12] [1] In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 97 (D.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
This may be a reason why such mutual pseudonymity is so rare.[12] [1] In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 97 (D.C. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
Defendants accused (perhaps wrongly) of serious misconduct Many defendants could be ruined simply by being publicly accused of certain offenses (rape, sexual harassment, embezzlement, fraud, malpractice, and the like)—or can be materially harmed even by being sued for more minor matters, such as in landlords' unlawful detainer actions against tenants. [1] Even if they know they're innocent, they might agree to settle as a means of avoiding the lawsuit even being filed, thus… [read post]
