Search for: "In re J.M.M."
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2009, 11:41 pm
I can only describe In Re: The Matter of the Paternity of D.J. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 5:54 am
With the notice of opposition, the opponent had requested revocation of the patent based on Article 100(a) (lack of novelty and lack of inventive step), Article 100(b) and Article 100(c) EPC.The documents cited during opposition proceedings included:D1: EP 0 953 289 A2D2: J.M.M. [read post]