Search for: "In re J.Q. (J.Q. v. State)"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2018, 11:57 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:57 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:57 am
In State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:14 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) James Lewis v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
[i] The Court re-affirmed these principles stating the following: The Copyright Act strikes “a balance between promoting the public interest in the encouragement and dissemination of works of the arts and intellect and obtaining a just reward for the creator… It seeks to ensure that an author will reap the benefits of his efforts, in order to incentivize the creation of new works. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
This information was enough to satisfy the Master that Facebook would be effective in bringing knowledge of the legal proceedings to the attention of the defendants.2 Facebook, for its part, was quite happy with the result, stating: “We’re pleased to see the Australian court validate Facebook as a reliable, secure and private medium for communication. [read post]
