Search for: "In re J.R., Juvenile" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2022, 12:45 pm
You're creating a record of something intangible; family love. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 8:03 am by Sam Hasler
Because wife contended that husband was not the biological father of J.R., there was a dispute as to whether J.R. was a child of the marriage. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
Finding it would serve no public purpose, the master recommended that none be re-tried.[13] That meant 4,500 cases of children appearing in that court from 2003 to 2008.[14] On October 29, 2009, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed. [read post]