Search for: "In re James C." Results 1 - 20 of 1,665
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 7:51 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Kinscherff and I co-teach that same law and mental health class at William James College. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
 Sources, Characteristics and Identification E. coli is an archetypal commensal bacterial species that lives in mammalian intestines. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Intensifies Scrutiny of Voting: ‘We’re keeping a close eye on you’ DNyuz – Nick Corasaniti, Alexandra Berzon, and Michael Gold (New York Times) | Published: 4/20/2024 Donald Trump’s campaign and the Republican National Committee plan to dispatch more than 100,000 volunteers and lawyers to monitor and potentially challenge the electoral process in each battleground state. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Another multi-district litigation (MDL) has hit a jarring speed bump. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
The Case and the Decision After his appointment as City Manager for Port Huron, Michigan, James Freed expanded the use of his “public” Facebook page to post about not only personal matters but also about matters related to his public office. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 6:42 am by familoo
In Re T (Adoption Hearing: Involvement of Applicants) [2024] EWCA Civ 189 the Court of Appeal corrected an erroneous practice in Cornwall relating to adoption hearings. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am by David Post
And this was, in Professor Re's view, "entirely consistent with settled case law" on which the "leading cases" are "unanimous. [read post]