Search for: "In re John Doe, born 12/29/96" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
FRANCISCO "FRANK" LOPEZ; from Nueces County; 13th Court of Appeals District (13-11-00757-CV, 443 SW3d 196, 06-27-13) The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court. - consolidated with - No. 14-0109 IN RE ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP; from Nueces County; 13th Court of Appeals District (13-11-00757-CV; 13-12-00023-CV, 443 SW3d 196, 06-27-13) The Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[6] In Canada, this connection between philosophy and law is borne out by the biographies of certain adjudicators. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
Incorporation of the Bill of Rights is a cryptic subject.12 There is little consensus on whether Black’s “total incorporation,”13 Frankfurter’s “fundamental fairness and ordered liberty,”14 or Brennan’s “selective incorporation,”15 if any, is correct.16 Concerning the Takings Clause, however, congressional records provide some insight but do not settle the question. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
 In other words, the cost of the contraceptive coverage in the self-insured setting is ultimately borne by the government itself, rather than by the organization or by the plan TPA. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
”[10] Third, in the course of endorsing the UNGP, the UNHRC also took the opportunity of creating an institutional organ within the aegis of the UN Geneva operations—a special procedure,[11] the Working Group on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational corporations and other business enterprises (the “UNGP Working Group”), as a coordinating body for further progress.[12] And Lastly, the UNHRC Res established “a Forum on Business and Human Rights… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
John’s Metropolitan Area Bd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1181 [Tock]; St. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
App.4th 89, 111-12 (2008) ("[n]o evidence suggests that [the prescriber] relied on" generic warnings). [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
That still does not negate the negligence — both direct and vicarious liability. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
That still does not negate the negligence — both direct and vicarious liability. [read post]