Search for: "In re Jost" Results 21 - 40 of 72
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2015, 7:53 am by Cathy Moran
 Just keep no more money there than you’re willing to lose if the bank does a set off. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am by Andrew Hamm
” Briefly: At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost reports on a recent Senate subcommittee hearing convened by Senator Ted Cruz to review possible changes to the current structure and power of the Supreme Court and concludes that “the two-hour hearing consisted mostly of second-guessing the court’s recent decisions. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Still more commentary comes from Kenneth Jost at Jost on Justice; from Adam Winkler at the Huffington Post; at PrawfsBlawg, where posts come from Richard Re, Howard Wasserman (who has four posts on the decision and how it is being implemented), Paul Horwitz, Rick Hills, and Hadar Aviram; from Karl Laird at the Oxford Human Rights Hub; at the Human Rights at Home Blog from Noah Novogrodsky; and from John Culhane for POLITICO. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re discusses last week’s denial of review in the gun rights case Jackson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re discusses last week’s decision in Wellness International Network v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:08 pm
Professor Tim Jost, who contests our interpretation of the PPACA on other points, described the HELP provisions in the same way in 2009 (see p. 7). [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
” At The Hill, Timothy Jost discusses the possible consequences if the Court were to hold in King v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:48 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost weighs in on the Court’s decision in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:47 am by Amy Howe
  Richard Re covered the oral argument for this blog, with other coverage coming from Kimberly Bennett of JURIST and commentary from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:59 am by Amy Howe
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost weighs in on the case of Cecil Clayton, a Missouri death row inmate whose execution the Supreme Court declined to block. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Amy Howe
”  At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley agrees that “Jost and Engstrand are on exactly the right track: they’re building a statutory case, premised on the text of the ACA as a whole, in favor of the government’s interpretation. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold is Version 3.1 of the census of law prof Twitter users. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost discusses last week’s oral arguments in the Alabama redistricting cases. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 5:23 am by Amy Howe
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re looks at how “three apparently unrelated cases . . . implicate the Supreme Court’s ability to send non-precedential signals to lower courts. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:06 pm by Michael Cannon
Even Washington & Lee University law professor Timothy Jost, a prominent critic of these cases, acknowledges the tax-credit eligibility rules “clearly say” exchange subsidies are available only through state-established exchanges. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:54 am by Steve Erickson
  Anyone who has spent any time within the field of psychology knows, if they're being honest, that the answer to that question is an emphatic "yes" all around. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the Court’s recent cert. denial in Jones v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am by Amy Howe
At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost reviews The Case Against the Supreme Court, the new book by Erwin Chemerinsky. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re considers the Court’s discussion of relative standing in Clapper v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
 Indeed, when pushed, noted health law professor Tim Jost acknowledged that, in his view, the phrase “established by the State” is “essentially meaningless. [read post]