Search for: "In re K Children "
Results 1 - 20
of 1,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 5:47 am
At first blush the decision in H-K (Children) [2011] EWCA Civ 1100, handed down today, may seem a little contrary: a family come to England clearly intending only to stay for a year, and yet the Court of Appeal held that they were habitually resident in this country.The Facts: The Father is an Australian citizen but appears to have dual British nationality. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 8:10 am
A Court of Appeal judgment today is another illustration of the need for such advice, with the mother and stepfather doing themselves no favours by the way they behaved, both with regard to the investigation by social services and the court proceedings, contravening the advice given in both posts.Re K (Children) [2012] EWCA Civ 1169 concerned an application by the mother and stepfather for permission to appeal against an interim care order removing the child from their care and… [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:03 am
Re K (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 1075 (28 July 2011), reported today on Bailii, concerned a judge's attempt to establish contact between an eleven year-old child and her mother, who resides predominantly in Bulgaria.The Facts: The child has for some four years resided with her father in England, and he was granted a residence order on the 15th October 2010. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 2:19 am
However this is not normally suitable in cases where there are live safeguarding issues concerning the children, such as in Re K. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 10:55 am
See http://www.sharonwallin.com for more information. -- Karen Kirby, parent of two children who went through the Irvine School District from K-12 This is a post from BestAttorney.com - BISNAR | CHASE California Personal Injury Lawyers [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 11:03 am
See http://www.sharonwallin.com for more information. -- Karen Kirby, parent of two children who went through the Irvine School District from K-12 This is a post from BestAttorney.com - BISNAR | CHASE California Personal Injury Lawyers [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:28 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) K (Children), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 1169 (30 August 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Morgan, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 1939 (24 August 2012) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:32 am
"And while we're at it, anyone think we'd still be wasting as much time and resources on phys ed if the education of children (rather than catering to the needs of existing teachers and other interests) was the primary goal of K-12 schooling? [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 11:32 am
("The intervening respondent is the maternal grandmother (grandmother) of four minor children, I, A, K and T (children), who are in the custody of the petitioner, the commissioner of children and families (commissioner). [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:29 pm
The good news is you’re not alone. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 12:47 pm
Yes, you can bring your children with you using this method. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 3:15 pm
Maybe they’re right that the system is slanted, but K-Fed is hardly the poster boy for responsible parenting. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 7:53 pm
After 2005, they decided to have children. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Juvenile Law Opinions Body: SC19447 - In re Naveah W. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:08 am
SC19020 - In re Jahquise K. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
We hope you’ll stop by our Children’s Rights display next time you’re in the Law Library Reading Room. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 10:18 am
We're glad to see they agree with us: "There is nothing more important than fame. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:46 pm
3-5-2010 National:CHARLOTTE, NC (WBTV) - The sordid side of the Internet is that teens and children who are even younger are potentially exposed to porn and sexually explicit images daily.The younger you are, the more computer savvy you're likely to be and this is unsettling for many parents.Moms, dads, and even businesses, are now using a new device called the PORN Detection Sticks to find [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 10:39 am
Not in the case of In re Carlton, Case No: 300-40223, an unpublished case from U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:47 am
Not in the case of In re Carlton, Case No: 300-40223, an unpublished case from U.S. [read post]
