Search for: "In re Keegan M." Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2016, 1:18 pm by familoo
And now I’ve thought of it I’m sort of wondering why…wouldn’t it have closed the loop and forced everyone to sing from the same hymn sheet? [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 4:55 am by Steven Gursten
” *    *    * “As Google has emphasized to us Glass Explorers, Glass is meant for ‘micro-interactions,’ meaning that you just quickly look up at Glass for a short burst of information, and then go back to what you’re doing. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 6:59 am by SHG
” They’re freaks of nature. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Jordan Furlong
They invariably realize that they don’t know what they’re supposed to do or how they’re supposed to do it. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:13 am by GuestPost
  The judiciary in the mid 1940’s began to change their stance in relation to illegitimate children with Duffy P in Re M an Infant [1946] I R 334 opining that all children have the same “natural and imprescriptible rights” regardless of whether they are born outside of wedlock. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:59 am by Emma Snell
I’m not sure he’s in control either, really,” Keegan told Sky News. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 7:54 am by Charlie Dunlap
But if your seatmate happens to be Rosa Brooks, you know you’re going to have an interesting and thoughtful ride. [read post]