Search for: "In re Kelly (1983)" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 7:05 pm by ZMan!
Dubois and supporters plan to release his proposals Tuesday because May 25 is National Missing Children’s Day, first proclaimed by President Reagan in 1983. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:04 am
Since broad discovery was permitted in 1966, Rule 26 has been amended in 1980, 1983, 1987, 1993, 2000, and 2006. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by Bexis
  But we’ll let Kelly Lightfoot smack us down in her own words:In Regenerative Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  In re Darvocet, Darvon & Propoxyphene Products Liability Litigation, 2012 WL 3842045, at *7-8 (E.D. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Wilder, No. 06-60711 In a to 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit against the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks and two of its employees, dismissal of claims against one defendant is affirmed where defendant was entitled to qualified immunity because his actions, in the form of pressuring and assisting plaintiff in committing a charged crime, even to the extent that they constituted entrapment under state law, did not by themselves constitute a violation of a constitutional… [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 12:20 pm
NIMH Grant MH33678-01, "The Evaluation of Child Molesters," May 1, 1980 - April 30, 1983 (extended to July 31, 1985). [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The quantum of proof required to prove kinship is a fair preponderance of the credible evidence (Matter of Jennings, 6 AD3d 867 [3d Dept 2004]; Matter of Whelan, 93 AD2d 891 [2d Dept 1983], affd 62 NY2d 657 [1984]). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
  There’s a twofer out of the Sunshine State, Kelly v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Kelly, No. 01-2736 "Denial of petitions for writs of habeas corpus are affirmed where although English language deficiency can warrant tolling of the AEDPA limitations period, petitioners have failed to allege circumstances establishing the due diligence required to warrant tolling. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
Rueda argues that because the unsigned opinion of Judge Davidson was his first decision, he could not re-determine the merits in a subsequently signed decision. [read post]