Search for: "In re L Children "
Results 1 - 20
of 1,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2010, 2:45 am
The case of Re L-W (Children) EWCA Civ 1253, decided last week, perhaps demonstrated the limits of the courts powers when dealing with an intractable contact dispute.The facts: The father and the mother have two children: M, a boy, born in 1999, and E, a girl, born in 2001. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 5:13 am
” The post Rayden Solicitors in Court of Appeal on important International issue re children appeared first on Rayden Solicitors. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
In re A (Children) (Judgment: Adequacy of Trial Judge’s Reasoning) [2011] EWCA Civ 1205; [2011] WLR (D) 346 “The Court of Appeal gave guidance as to the practice to be adopted where there was concern about the adequacy of a trial judge’s reasoning, when adjourning, part heard, an appeal by the mother of two children, A and L, against the decision of Judge Compston, sitting as a judge of the Family Division on 27 May 2011, as to the adequacy of… [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:04 am
The School Law Blog reports that the Liberty Counsel has announced that In re Rachel L. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
Facts: Mother and Father married and had three children. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 4:15 pm
Regarding the welfare of children who definitely were given the best possible chance to succeed.Not. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 5:23 pm
April 26, 2016 The biological mother (petitioner) Beverly L. surrendered her parental rights of her 2 daughters Kendall and Brooke, and her son Zachary. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:44 pm
You can view or download the case here: In re Burnett © 2010, Melinda Deel. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 8:44 am
Michelle L. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:08 am
The three children were subsequently adopted. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:45 am
There is, of course, already considerable guidance for the courts when dealing with children applications involving domestic violence, see Practice Direction 12J and the leading case of Re L, Re V, Re M & Re H (Contact: Domestic Violence) [2000] EWCA Civ 194. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:55 am
In In re Rachel L., (CA Ct. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:15 pm
These payments are intended to support the guardians in meeting the needs of the children. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 3:03 pm
A bunch of people have written in about In re Rachel L., a California Court of Appeal decision holding that there's no constitutional right to home-school your children. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm
(Termination of parental rights; whether, in addition to their statutory right to conflict free counsel...the court should hold that the children also had a procedural due process right to such counsel under the state and federal constitutions); In re Alizabeth L. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
K639.A41989 C66 2014 La Convention internationale des droits de l’enfant (CIDE) : une convention particulière. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 8:17 am
They're not just lawyers, they're fathers of young children, trying to juggle the demands of a busy law practice and family life. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
J and L, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon (2017) EWHC 3411 (Admin) This is a very interesting judicial review, concerning the interrelation of a council’s housing duties under Part 6 and Part 7 Housing Act 1996 and duties to children under s.17 Children Act 1989. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:47 am
"Rather than feeling worried or disappointed about how things are going in their children’s lives, eight in 10 parents say they feel proud and hopeful. 'These parents, who are Gen X, are more willing to say, "Hey, this is good, I like these people, they’re interesting, they’re fun to be with,"' said Karen L. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:01 am
In re Nordic Naturals, Inc., Appeal No. 2013-1492 (Fed. [read post]
