Search for: "In re Lacee L." Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2011, 10:16 am by Elie Mystal
Please let me know if you have any questions.Thanks,Shirley Shirley L. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
Instead of inspecting meat production lines, agency personnel were busy beavers inspecting written HACCP Plans, and ensuring that plants had an abundance of bullet-proof scientific articles justifying every decision appearing in the plant's HACCP Plan.Who cared if pathogen-laced meat was flowing down the production lines? [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:31 am by John L. Welch
CUSTOMS Logo Barred by Sections 2(a) and 2(b)Failure to Function:Precedential No. 8: Divided TTAB Panel Affirms Refusal to Register Chippendales' "Cuffs & Collar Mark"Precedential No. 4: TTAB Rules that a Sound Emitted by Goods in Normal Course of Operation Cannot Be Inherently DistinctiveFamous Marks Doctrine:Precedential No. 17: TTAB Dismisses Bayer "FLANAX" Cancellation Claims - No Famous Marks Exception in US LawFraud:Precedential No 42: TTAB Denies Fraud Summary… [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:44 am by John L. Welch
CAFC Affirms TTAB Genericness Ruling re "MATTRESS.COM" for -- Guess What? [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
(Trademark Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturns State anti-counterfeiting law: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v Omar (IP Spotlight Precedential no. 39: TTAB reverses 2(d) refusal of VOLTA for caffeine-laced vodka: In re White Rock Distilleries, Inc (TTABlog) Test your TTAB eye-ball ability on two triangle design marks for clothing: L.A. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 10:12 pm
In re White Rock Distilleries, Inc., 92 USPQ2d 12982 (TTAB 2009) [precedential].The Marks: The Board found that term TERZA "clearly dominates over the term VOLTA in the registered mark. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against finding of the… [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:02 pm
It seems clear that, once a product is covered by a utility patent, a trademark applicant is going to have a heck of a time convincing the Board that the product design somehow qualifies for a trademark registration.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Skeel Jr. and George Krause-Vilmar, "Recharacterization and the Nonhindrance of Creditors" (Abstract ID:  963338)***LSE's Paul L. [read post]