Search for: "In re M&F Worldwide" Results 1 - 20 of 132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2016, 9:00 am by Albert J. Carroll
This decision does a good job of explaining how the M&F Worldwide criteria are to be applied to a given set of facts at the motion to dismiss stage. [read post]
29 May 2013, 4:41 pm by Steve Bainbridge
A client memo from Richard, Layton & Finger informs that a new opinion by Chancellor Strine, In re MFW Shareholders Litigation, involved a merger of M&F Worldwide Corp. with its controlling... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
M & F Worldwide Corp., the Delaware Supreme Court held that freeze-out mergers, in which a controlling stockholder takes a company private, are subject to Delaware’s heightened “entire fairness” standard of review unless subject, at the outset, to approval by both (i) an independent special committee, and (ii) an uncoerced, fully informed majority of the minority stockholder vote (“MFW Framework”). [read post]
M&F Worldwide Corp.[1] (“MFW”) on how boards can structure special committees and minority stockholder votes to have board decisions adjudicated under the highly deferential protection of the business judgment rule.[2] However, the Delaware Court of Chancery recently found in In re Dell Technologies Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 7:46 pm by Francis Pileggi
The opinion also features one of the first applications of the recent Supreme Court opinion in M&F Worldwide, highlighted here, which provides that a deal with a controlling shareholder, in order to enjoy the business judgment rule standard of review, be conditioned ab initio on a majority of the minority approval, and approval by an independent special committee. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 3:21 am by Broc Romanek
M&F Worldwide Corp., 88 A.3d 635 (Del. 2014), because, among other things, it was not conditioned from the outset on approval from a majority of the outstanding minority shares. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Following M&F Worldwide, the Supreme Court issued Robert A. [read post]