Search for: "In re Maison W." Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2011, 2:31 am by Lorraine Hostettler
Dès lors, A.________, propriétaire unique de l'immeuble, récupère en quelque sorte le montant de 153'273 fr. 90 investi dans la maison lors de son acquisition, sans avoir dû payer quoi que ce soit à son ex-épouse. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:32 am by John L. Welch
Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 73 USPQ2d at 1696, quoting In re Pan Tex Hotel Corp., 190 USPQ 109, 110 (TTAB 1976).Applicant argued that purchasers are not likely to translate LES COLLINES because of the manner in which the terms are encountered in the "unique marketplace environment of vineyards, wineries and viticulture," where foreign names abound and purchasers of the involved services are sophisticated. [read post]