Search for: "In re Mark R." Results 1 - 20 of 9,558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2014, 12:56 pm by Steve Bainbridge
I'm pleased to allow Mark the opportunity to reply in a... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 12:24 am
The SEC hold a federal judge yesterday that it will not be re-filing its complaint for insider trading against Mark Cuban. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 2:12 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Mark Hall attacks the 11th Circuit decision striking down Obamacare's individual mandate, opining that: On the slippery slope concern: To connect this conduct to interstate commerce would . . . [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
The PTO refused to register the mark CHED 'R' WEDGES for "pet food; pet treats," finding the mark merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:17 am
R. 32.1(e), the CAFC has re-designated as precedential its opinion in In re GO & Associates, LLC, Appeal No. 2022-1961 (Fed. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 11:27 am by Steve Bainbridge
I got an email from one of Mark Cuban's lawyers in regard to this post about the upshot of the Cuban case. [read post]
16 May 2022, 12:10 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
After re-examining the case, the BoA allowed the EUTM in Classes 31 and 32, but rejected it in the remaining classes (R 2040/2019-4). [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 2:54 am
The USPTO issued a Section 2(e)(1) refusal of the mark SOL-R, finding it to be merely descriptive of constructions materials, including "metal cantilevered brackets for solar panels" and "roofing incorporation solar cells. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 8:23 pm
By Mark Chael -- The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. recently announced that as part of its semi-annual re-ranking of the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index ® (NBI), thirteen securities have been added to the index, while four have been dropped. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:05 am
See Dial-A-Mattress I, 57 USPQ2d at 1813 (“Although the registration of the ‘(212) M-A-T-R-E-S-S’ mark is a ‘phantom’ mark, … ‘1-888-M-A-TR-E-S-S’ is the legal equivalent of the ‘(212) M-A-T-T-R-E-S-S’ mark. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 12:00 am by Beth Van Schaack
Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL) has co-sponsored S. 284 along with most of the previous co-sponsors. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 8:03 pm
California - In In re BP Lubricants USA Inc., the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals held that a false marking claim must satisfy the particularity standard of Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b), which requires that complaints alleging fraud or mistake "state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake. [read post]