Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 141 - 160
of 29,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2010, 8:43 am
Mark E. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:23 am
Legal Rules Requiring Pleading in Particular: In the case In re BP Lucricants, ___ F.3d ___ (Fed. [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:00 am
If you're a litigator who does a lot of consumer defense work in California, you might think about writing a thank-you note to Mark Robinson, Jr., senior partner at Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:04 pm
’ You’re the real Mark Lanier! [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 4:15 am
We’re very proud of being Asian—we’re not going to hide that fact. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 8:57 am
” Read In Their Own Words. . . .Rice University Political Science Professor Mark Jones at constantinecannon.com [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 2:31 pm
If it’s the right person, we’re always open to the right kind of hire. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 2:02 pm
Invested with Mark Lamendola ? [read post]
29 May 2014, 6:00 am
If you use a mark similar to a registered mark, for similar services, you're probably infringing. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 7:44 am
The Ethiopian Registry Office has apparently announced that trade mark applications filed before 7 July 2006 should be “re-registered” under the new law if they are to be effective in Ethiopia. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:17 am
[on] which the mark is used. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 10:09 pm
Episode 8 of the Class Re-Action Podcast is now live, and it is a special one. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 7:23 pm
Beauty Marks make valid points about Jet Blue's' new JETTING campaign, and its inability to obtain exclusivity to words such as JETS and JETTING (less so re JETTER). [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 2:56 am
On July 17, 2013, the Board re-designated as precedential its January 29, 2013 opinion in the ROLEX/ROLL-X case, vacating its original decision of December 5, 2011. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:29 pm
"We're able to see child porn as it crosses Internet lines. [read post]
19 May 2017, 3:02 am
" In re Primo Water Corp. 87 USPQ2d 1376, 1378 (TTAB 2008). [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:48 am
On June 6, 2012, the Board re-designated as precedential its decision in In re Azteca Systems, Inc., 102 USPQ2d 1955 (TTAB 2012). [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:01 am
In re Krete LLC, Serial No. 90369855 (June 24, 2002) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:00 pm
See In re Wella A.G., 5 USPQ2d 1359, 1361 (TTAB 1987) (Wella II), 8 USPQ2d 1365 (Fed. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:12 pm
MARK STEYN on the San Francisco Chronicle: "There is no explanation for the Chronicle's action if they're in the newspaper business (ie, in attracting readers, selling copies, etc.). [read post]
