Search for: "In re Marriage of Branch" Results 1 - 20 of 294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2021, 12:34 pm by Mark Ashton
By mid March the Governor essentially closed state government and the judicial branch followed suit. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 3:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
All of these policy pronouncements coming out of Washington over the past few months points to the massive task of re-writing a significant portion of the United States Code in light of the demise of DOMA, and in favor of valid same-sex marriages. [read post]
25 May 2010, 2:32 am
Well, apart from indicating that our next branch office should be located in a Conservative constituency, not a lot. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am by Thomas C. Berg - Guest
  Like Judge Walker, the California Supreme Court in In re Marriage Cases (2008) found that same-sex civil marriage “will not impinge upon the religious freedom of” anyone, for two reasons: “no religion will be required to change its religious policies or practices with regard to same-sex couples, and no religious officiant will be required to solemnize a marriage in contravention of his or her religious beliefs. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 1:37 pm
  Here's a snippet from his opening brief:“[D]espite my sincere prayer for relief by the Court, I am also praying for a higher authority to cause a well timed avalanche that kills the majority of a certain judges family, or a tree branch that breaks the neck of the young boy in the front yard, or a drunk driver tee bones the right side door at high speed while the daughter is returning from her senior prom. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 1:28 pm by Larry Ribstein
And while we’re talking about e-marriage, how about e-abortion: [T]elemedicine abortions. . . allow women to go to a branch clinic to consult via Internet videoconferencing with a physician located miles away. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:34 pm by Mark Ashton
By mid March the Governor essentially closed state government and the judicial branch followed suit. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:00 am by Howard Wasserman
My new essay, Rejecting Sovereign Immunity in Public Law Litigation, has been published at Fordham Law Review's Res Gestae. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It is hard to imagine a similar re-imagination of Obergefell as a decision that thwarts rather than serves gay liberation. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 6:14 am by David Lat
We’re here at the National LGBT Bar Association’s Annual Lavender Law Career Fair and Conference, attending a great panel about relationship recognition (aka marriage equality aka same-sex marriage).You can access the liveblog after the jump.Here’s the panel description, from Lavender Law:Relationship Recognition: Ends, Means, and the Path AheadThis panel will examine selected developments in the struggle for marriage equality for same-sex… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 9:19 pm
It is worth emphasizing however that a couple intending to use or, as occurred here, has already used an Indiana marriage license for an out-of-state marriage should take the additional step of re-solemnizing their marriage in Indiana in order to avoid future questions about its validity. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am by Steven Calabresi
” – In re Burrus (1890) “[W]hile rare instances arise in which it is necessary to answer a substantial federal question that transcends or exists apart from the family law issue, in general it is appropriate for the federal courts to leave delicate issues of domestic relations to the state courts. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:34 pm
  "Only when an executive branch's action conflicts with the Legislature's action or usurps its prerogative, does the executive branch violate the separation of powers doctrine," she asserted. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:49 am
These statistics represent members of all military branches. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  President Obama announced his support for gay marriage before winning re-election in November 2012, and still won. [read post]