Search for: "In re Marriage of Dunn"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2007, 9:53 am
Following up on yesterday's post about Stephen Dunne, who failed the Massachusetts Bar exam because he wouldn't answer a question touching on gay marriage, I've got some weekend reading for everybody, if they're interested. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 12:42 pm
Stephen Dunne must have missed that day of bar review. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 10:05 pm
Stephen Dunne, 30, flunked the Massachusetts bar exam and now says it was because he refused on principle to answer an exam question concerning the rights of two married lesbians, their children and property. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:40 am
To ensure that you do not miss any updates in your reader, please take a moment and re-subscribe to the new feed address (if you have not already done so): http://www.ohioemployerlawblog.com/feeds/posts/default Related StoriesGiving Employee the “Milton Treatment” Leads to Discrimination ClaimThe one thing you can never release in a settlement agreementWhy Paula Deen loves gay marriage [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:40 am
To ensure that you do not miss any updates in your reader, please take a moment and re-subscribe to the new feed address (if you have not already done so): http://www.ohioemployerlawblog.com/feeds/posts/default Related StoriesGiving Employee the “Milton Treatment” Leads to Discrimination ClaimThe one thing you can never release in a settlement agreementWhy Paula Deen loves gay marriage [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 6:15 am
[DealBook / New York Times] * Ted Olson and David Boies, perhaps more commonly known these days as the gay marriage dream team, will be working together to challenge Virginia’s ban on marriage equality. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 12:44 pm
A lot of the questions that... we're asking your colleague in the earlier part of the argument... had that in mind, I think. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 3:29 am
"Dunn's co-investigators are UBC Psychology Asst. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 6:10 am
” Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, the firm behind the “Bridgegate” report that cleared Gov. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
We are not talking here just about the scope of Judge Walker’s injunctive remedy against State officials, but whether the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs itself has to be erased and re-sought (in a different form) by the plaintiffs. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 6:11 am
Depends if you’re winning. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 6:15 am
Alas, no same-sex marriage cases have been added yet. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:52 pm
Kish Funeral Homes, LLC, a 20-page opinion re an interlocutory appeal, Judge Vaidik writes:Burns-Kish Funeral Homes, Inc. is a family-run funeral home in northwest Indiana that has been in existence for a century. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:48 am
You’re screwing off. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 1:01 pm
Of course, just because “marriage” is left undefined in the Constitution doesn’t mean that it is a blank slate, capable of radical re-conception of any sort. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:41 pm
Senate Republicans sharply questioned Solicitor General nominee Donald Verrilli Jr. on Wednesday over the Obama administration's decision in February to no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as between a man and a woman. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:49 pm
” (But tragically, it seems they’re not alone.) [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:26 am
— from The Emplawyerologist Wage & Hour For Same-Sex Couples: If You’re Married in CT, You Have a ‘Spouse’ Under FMLA — from Dan Schwartz’s Connecticut Employment Law Blog DOL Updates Guidance on FMLA and Same-Sex Marriage — from Jeff Nowak’s FMLA Insights FMLA Leave or ADA Accommodation (Or Both)? [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:26 am
— from The Emplawyerologist Wage & Hour For Same-Sex Couples: If You’re Married in CT, You Have a ‘Spouse’ Under FMLA — from Dan Schwartz’s Connecticut Employment Law Blog DOL Updates Guidance on FMLA and Same-Sex Marriage — from Jeff Nowak’s FMLA Insights FMLA Leave or ADA Accommodation (Or Both)? [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:03 pm
You're looking at not one, but two SCOTUS clerks. [read post]