Search for: "In re Marriage of George"
Results 1 - 20
of 406
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2010, 10:34 am
In fact, speaking personally, I’ve never needed to go beyond the core case we’re arguing about: any definition of marriage that excludes same-sex couples strikes me as already underinclusive. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 6:32 pm
If you're keen to read about marriage issues, the symposium articles are available here.The articles present a range of opinion, but first one I looked at (George W. [read post]
BREAKING NEWS -- Supreme Court of California issues same-sex marriage ruling in In re Marriage Cases
15 May 2008, 11:04 am
BREAKING NEWS -- Supreme Court of California holds in In re Marriage Cases that "to the extent the current California statutory provisions limit marriage to opposite-sex couples, these statutes are unconstitutional. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:42 pm
Justice George is well-known for authoring California Supreme Court's 2008 opinion the case of In re Marriage Cases, case number S147999. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:20 am
They’re both right. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:44 pm
Thus the Mediterranean, a point of both intersection and mixing where ideas about the ‘West’ and its ‘other’, are re-produced and transformed, has witnessed how these transitions resulted in either a tense relationship between marriages regulated by formal, state laws and religious marriages celebrated according to informal, religious norms, or on the other end of the spectrum, civil marriages and (certain) religious marriages… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:40 am
Congressional Republicans are sending lawyers to court to defend the ban on federal recognition of same-sex marriage, but they're not ignoring the court of public opinion. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 8:15 pm
(Story, complete with red-baiting by George H. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
re not saying we'd do so hot ourselves. ... [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 9:27 pm
Instead, it cements their mutual love, affection, and friendship (if they're lucky). [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:35 am
Bush – who had pushed earlier for a Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) that would have banned same-sex marriage – was seeking re-election. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 7:06 am
Thus the Mediterranean, a point of both intersection and mixing whereideas about the ‘West’ and its ‘other’, are re-produced and transformed, has witnessed howthese transitions resulted in either a tense relationship between marriages regulated by formal,state laws and religious marriages celebrated according to informal, religious norms, or onthe other end of the spectrum, civil marriages and (certain) religious marriages… [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 7:06 am
Thus the Mediterranean, a point of both intersection and mixing whereideas about the ‘West’ and its ‘other’, are re-produced and transformed, has witnessed howthese transitions resulted in either a tense relationship between marriages regulated by formal,state laws and religious marriages celebrated according to informal, religious norms, or onthe other end of the spectrum, civil marriages and (certain) religious marriages… [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 3:59 pm
What is arguably the most important thing to take away from this case is the importance of acting in all due haste, whatever relief you’re seeking from a court. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 10:00 am
The review is by Judge George Anagnost. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:45 am
Mike Miller Jr., D-Calvert and Prince George’s. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:50 pm
Download PDF file of In re Marriage Cases [read post]
23 May 2008, 3:54 pm
Consider the following language from page 80 of Chief Justice Ronald George's majority opinion in In re Marriage Cases [.pdf]: "We have no occasion in this case to determine whether the state constitutional right to marry necessarily affords all couples the constitutional right to require the state to designate their official family relationship a 'marriage,' or whether, as the attorney general suggests, the Legislature would not violate a… [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:14 pm
This morning California Supreme Court justices hinted strongly that they will uphold Proposition 8, the November ballot initiative limiting marriage to heterosexual couples.The only bright spot for gay marriage advocates during the three hours and 15 minutes of argument came when the justices indicated that marriages held after last spring's In re Marriage Cases ruling but before the November vote would retain the force of law.Chief Justice Ronald… [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:46 am
The majority was made up entirely of judges appointed by former Governor George Pataki, a Republican. [read post]
