Search for: "In re Marriage of Harms"
Results 21 - 40
of 967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2010, 11:26 am
In the first order he issued in this case, Judge Walker made it clear that he was ready to give the plaintiffs the chance to put all the arguments about marriage on trial—for example, how the marriages of same-sex couples “harm” heterosexual marriages, and whether heterosexuals make better parents. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
Utah 2013)), Turley argues that post-Lawrence, the ability to show harm from specifically consensual, adult plural marriages is very difficult if not impossible. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 3:16 pm
A person’s hidden defects may be discovered after irreparable harm. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
Children, being natural conformists, tend to be upset upon discovering that they’re not in [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:53 am
I believe that applying the well-established (and recently re-energized) principles of Islamic partnership law to Muslim marriage contracts would have several advantages over the current sales-based framework, including eliminating several traditional rules that have been harmful to women. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 6:03 pm
Though well-intentioned, they don’t always know what they’re talking about. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:11 pm
I will not join the fray here on that question (although it seems hard for Prop 8 proponents to argue irreparable harm if the order is not stayed, since Californians have been living with the thousands of civil marriages by same-sex couples, entered into the several month interim between the California Supreme Court’s In re Marriage Cases ruling and voter approval of Prop. 8). [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:58 pm
Their harm isn't hypothetical, but real, and suffered every day. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm
” So, we can find plenty of animus propelling these initiatives if we’re simply willing to see it. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 8:23 pm
Same-sex marriage was never at issue in the case, although Gallagher implies that it was because it was decided at almost the same time as In re Marriage Cases. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 4:20 pm
From In re Marriage of V.I. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
Maybe the Texas Supreme Court is reading this opinion right now and thinking about deciding the Texas state case In re J.B. out of the Dallas court on the validity of same-sex marriages and the right of Texas to grant a same-sex divorce. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 1:06 pm
The wife was far from perfect as well.The harm, of course, was not only to the judiciary and to the massive waste of attorney's fees. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm
Judge Donovan found that the Debtors bankruptcy filing would have no effect on procreation or child-bearing, or that it would in any way harm any marriage of heterosexual persons, or affect the creditors. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:28 pm
In re the Marriage of Zigler and Sidwell This case is a good example of how our state law on modification of parenting plans works. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 11:01 pm
... if you're seeking asylum in the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:51 pm
And Kennedy’s concern about the dignity of same-sex couples and their children, along with the harm he has acknowledged that marriage bans impose on them, also suggest that he will decide the case mostly on equal protection grounds. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 12:49 pm
A year later, Eichleberger proposed (permanent link) re-introduction of a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriages. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 6:03 am
Though their heart may be in the right place, they don’t always know what they’re talking about. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
In In re Marriage of Balashov, (WA Ct. [read post]
