Search for: "In re Marriage of Hodges" Results 141 - 160 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In the decades before marriage equality, many same-sex couples relied on so-called second-parent adoption to protect the relationship between the non-biological parent and her partner’s child. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Hodges in 2015, as “not in the Constitution” and a product of the Court’s “edict. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Edith Roberts
Willett was re-elected to that position in 2006 and again in 2012, the second time with 78 percent of the vote. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 12:23 am by Frank Cranmer
Overkill, maybe: but we haven’t seen so much interest in a consistory court judgment since Re St Giles, Exhall. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am by Frank Cranmer
Citing Hodge QC, Ch in Re St Peter & St Paul Newport Pagnell [2020] ECC Oxf 8 and Eyre Ch in Re St Nicholas, Warwick (2010) 12 EccLJ 407 at paragraph 19, he noted that “the correct approach to the removal of pipe organs has been much considered by the consistory courts”, and concluded: “[20]…The presumption in favour of a further pipe organ is more likely to be rebutted by those who can show that the preference for… [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
Hodges, 14-556 (Ohio), Tanco v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Zoe Stern
Hodges, which protects the right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
By the time the Court managed to recognize a right to same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Robot lawyers might not be here yet but you’re already using AI when you do legal research on Westlaw. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 12:40 am by Frank Cranmer
HHJ Hodge Dep Ch concluded that its removal and relocation would result in harm to the significance of the Chapel as a building of special architectural or historic interest. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm by Jane S. Schacter
Hodges hammered this theme, repeatedly analogizing the ruling in favor of marriage equality to the discredited Lochner doctrine, calling the majority opinion an “act of will, not legal judgment,” and provocatively asking: “Just who do we think we are? [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am by Guest Blogger
Hodges, the Court held that “same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry in all States. [read post]
The re-examination was also propelled by a 2015 EEOC ruling, in which it held, as a matter of agency interpretation, that discrimination against a man because he was gay constituted a form of actionable sex discrimination. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Given that, we’re pleased to have the chance to ask you, and now David, the questions for a change. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Grant Hayden
But they’re not identical, and the jurisprudence, despite Judge Ho’s contention, is not at all the same.Judge Ho notes that “Three circuits to date have construed Title VII to prohibit sexual orientation discrimination or transgender discrimination. [read post]