Search for: "In re Marriage of Reinhardt"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2020, 4:25 am
He implied that my marriage had not been consummated. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
And if you’re Reinhardt, make the opinion “per curiam” so it doesn’t come to the Court with your name on it. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm
ACLU/SC represented several same-sex couples and organizations in In re Marriage Cases, in which the California Supreme Court held that California’s pre-Proposition 8 statutory definition of marriage as the union of a man and a woman violated the State Constitution. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:48 pm
To see this, imagine you’re a California voter and you’re not sure if you think the state should recognize same-sex marriage. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
That notion dates all the way back to a Supreme Court decision in 1890 in the case of In re Burrus. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:47 am
Judge Hawkins jumps immediately to a comparison to school segregation, which Cooper unsuccessfully attempts to distinguish using SCOTUS Loving precedent (re interracial marriage). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm
Judge Reinhardt pressed Olson to say whether the Circuit Court, in order to strike down the marriage ban, had to declare that there was a constitutional right to gay marriage. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:20 pm
REINHARDT, MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS and N. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:22 am
” I take it we're supposed to infer some sort of conflict of interest? [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 4:50 pm
He appears to believe that same-sex marriage advocates might be best advised to make maximalist arguments now, to go for broke, as long as they’re likely to lose anyway. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:53 pm
Seeking to neutralize the issue, President Clinton, standing for re-election, announced his support for DOMA. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:13 am
” Striking a different note, Dale Carpenter of the Volokh Conspiracy argues that “a loss in the Supreme Court could be much more narrow,” leaving open “other, more completely theorized, arguments for same-sex marriage”; Ilya Somin disagrees, contending that “[i]f the Supreme Court embraces Reinhardt’s reasoning, a state that enacts a civil union law would have to embrace gay marriage as well. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:07 am
Commentators also continue to discuss and debate the possible path of same-sex marriage to the Court. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
United States District Court (In re United States), 791 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2015). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:46 pm
Stephen Reinhardt. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:47 pm
Stephen Reinhardt. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
For example, at this time we have not evaluated the financial impact ofthe Act on the State of New Jersey, in comparison to marriage,8 nor have we reviewed the4Domestic Partnership Act,9 as required by the Act. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
Politics and Judicial Recusals: Healthcare and the Same Sex Marriage Litigation. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:11 pm
The Watkins ruling was vacated by a larger panel of the 9th Circuit, which instead ruled in Watkins' favor using a non-constitutional theory of estoppel, reasoning that since the Army had allowed Watkins to re-enlist several times even though his homosexuality was known to them, it was precluded from rejecting his re-enlistment. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The asylum application stated that Arturas had suffered persecution in Israel because of his Catholic faith and Lithuanian origin, that Edita had suffered persecution in Lithuania because of her Jewish faith, and that they both suffered persecution in Israel because of their interfaith marriage. [read post]
