Search for: "In re Marriage of Roe" Results 1 - 20 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2012, 4:19 am by Lawrence Solum
When Federal District Judge Vaughn Walker, presiding over the Proposition 8 trial, asked the lawyer for the gay couples challenging California’s ban on same-sex marriage whether the danger was “not that you’re going to lose this case, either here or at the Court of Appeals or at the Supreme Court, but that you might win it,” the judge was making reference to Roe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:59 am by David Oscar Markus
”Stewart, the Mississippi lawyer, blithely assured the justices that the court’s abortion cases are unique, and that its other precedents, on contraception, gay rights or same-sex marriage wouldn’t be next in line if Roe and Casey fell. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm by Dan Ernst
When Federal District Judge Vaughn Walker, presiding over the Proposition 8 trial, asked the lawyer for the gay couples challenging California’s ban on same-sex marriage whether the danger was “not that you’re going to lose this case, either here or at the Court of Appeals or at the Supreme Court, but that you might win it,” the judge was making reference to Roe v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:05 am
That's different from the demand for his opinion on same-sex marriage, "Do you support marriage equality? [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Will you appoint-- are you looking to appoint a justice who wants to overturn Roe v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 6:42 am
You can read and re-read the Constitution all you want. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:44 pm by Howard Bashman
” And Burgess Everett of Politico reports that “GOP freezes up on same-sex marriage; Senate Democrats won’t have assurances of the 10 Republican votes they need to break a filibuster on the issue; They’re moving ahead anyway. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am by Thomas C. Berg - Guest
  Like Judge Walker, the California Supreme Court in In re Marriage Cases (2008) found that same-sex civil marriage “will not impinge upon the religious freedom of” anyone, for two reasons: “no religion will be required to change its religious policies or practices with regard to same-sex couples, and no religious officiant will be required to solemnize a marriage in contravention of his or her religious beliefs. [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:06 pm
The recent California same-sex marriage case, In re Marriage Cases, 2008 WL 2051892, has drawn a lot of coverage primarily on account of its consequences: same-sex marriage is coming to California, and unless the voters overturn the result by referendum, which is doubtful, it is there to stay. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:40 am by Guest Blogger
” The Roe-centered backlash narrative, it seems, is the trump card in many discussions of the marriage cases. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 5:03 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Will you appoint — are you looking to appoint a justice who wants to overturn Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:26 am
Wade, and Justice Thomas wrote in a concurrence that he saw no reason not to overturn similar rulings on same sex marriage, the right to adult consensual sexual relations outside of marriage, and the right to contraception. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:35 am by Juggalo Law
It’s hilarious and terrible and low-budget and terrible and…you’re wrong, the baby died. lol? [read post]
2 Oct 2006, 5:52 am
I've decided gay marriage Is icky and weird. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm by Howard Friedman
 Chief Justice Roberts writing for the majority handed down an opinion which has the effect of re-instituting same-sex marriage in California, but only there. [read post]