Search for: "In re Marriage of Rome (1980)" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2013, 12:12 pm by Xandra Kramer
This article argues that the rationale for extending party choice to matrimonial property disputes is in need of re-examination. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm by Veronika Gaertner
This procedure was held to be equivalent to the conclusion of a marriage contract under German law (§ 1408 BGB). [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:59 am by Jan von Hein
But as the plaintiff is more familiar with its organization and activities it has a secondary burden of asserting relevant facts (sekundäre Vortragslast). [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:06 am by Martin George
On Choice of Law in Marriage and Divorce QUINZA, Pablo The establishment of an optional common European matrimonial property regime: an alternative way for international couples. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 6:15 am by Jennifer Davis
Chr. bis zur Diktatur Sullas (1982) Karlheinz Dietz, Senatus contra Principem: Untersuchungen zur Senatorischen Opposition gegen Kaiser Maximinus Thrax (1980) Israël Shatzman, Senatorial Wealth and Roman Politics (1975) Pierre Willems, Le Sénat de la République Romaine (1975) T. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
You’ll see here that we’re reading poems and a play.Seán Patrick Donlan (@spdonlan): Perhaps JM Coetzee's Waiting for the Barbarians (1980) or Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa's The Leopard (1958)? [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:25 am by Veronika Gaertner
Instead, the Court bases its judgment on the Rome Contracts Convention of 1980 whose direct applicability has been explicitly excluded by German legislation. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 5:22 pm
Sociologist Elise Boulding has said that we live in a “200 year present,” a “social space which reaches into the past and into the future” -- a space in which “we can move around directly in our own lives and indirectly by touching the lives of the young and old around us. [read post]