Search for: "In re Marriage of S. (1985)" Results 21 - 40 of 191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2023, 7:35 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Devick, 735 NE 2d 153 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 2000 (citing  Bryan-Barber Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 1:58 am by Frank Cranmer
Christopher Peak, a solicitor and Registrar to the Diocese of Gloucester between January 1985 and November 2012, has agreed with the Solicitors Regulation Authority to remove himself from the roll of solicitors. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
So too, the LGBTQ rights movement sought the freedom to marry under the banner of marriage equality--a point that Justice Kennedy's discussion in Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 12:04 pm by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Semmler, 481 NE 2d 716 – Ill: Supreme Court 1985 “Under the no-fault provisions of section 401(a)(2), dissolution is predicated upon a finding of “irretrievable breakdown” of the marriage due to “irreconcilable differences. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 8:30 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Simmons, 409 NE 2d 321 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1980 Including Third Parties Into An Illinois Divorce It is very easy to include these third parties into an Illinois divorce if the third party has in their possession what may be the couple’s marital property. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 12:35 pm by Michael Ehline
It’s estimated that these contaminants have been in the water supply from the 1950s through February 1985, as the wells were shut down. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 7:50 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Riedy, 474 NE 2d 28 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 1985 An ex-spouse countering a duress claim will say “a deal is a deal. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 7:00 am by Eugene Volokh
(Cal. 1985) explained that the public policy exception to the comity doctrine "precludes application of a foreign state's law where to do so would violate California's public policy. [read post]
15 May 2022, 7:38 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Falat, 559 NE 2d 33 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1990 It is the duty of the party appealing to both identify the error and the resulting prejudicial impact. [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:35 pm by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Henry, 696 NE 2d 1181 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 1998 This easy victory only lasts for so long. [read post]
8 May 2022, 7:13 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Schwartz, 475 NE 2d 1077 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1985 Motion To Preserve The Status Quo vs. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:38 pm by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Kloster, 469 NE 2d 381 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 1984 “It is also well settled that the terms of a settlement agreement are subject to the ordinary rules for the construction of contracts” In re Marriage of Lorton, 203 Ill. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Doing so--as Justice Brennan did in a dissent in a 1985 case--seems to lead to the conclusion that the Eleventh Amendment was meant to limit the scope of diversity jurisdiction but not (as in Hans and more recent cases) federal question jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” That criticism laid the groundwork for the conservative embrace of originalism, which Rehnquist’s longtime sparring partner, liberal Justice William Brennan, would critique in a 1985 speech as “arrogance cloaked as humility. [read post]