Search for: "In re Marriage of Wells (1989)" Results 61 - 80 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2017, 12:56 pm
The most theatrical blow that the island has taken in recent times is, of course, the one that struck us on December 17, 2014: the re-establishing of ties between the Cuban and American governments. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 3:37 am by Robin Shea
Well, you might ask, then why have the courts interpreted “sex” in Title VII to include gender identity? [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:59 am by Mark Walsh
We’re in no position to assess the current state of the McDonnells’ marriage, which has been strained by the criminal case, but they are together here today. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 11:12 am by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
It is curious to also note that the Appellate Division referred to R. 4:50-1(f) as further possible support for a court’s authority to re-open the executory provisions of a prior Judgment. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 12:05 pm by David M. Goldman
To decide if the slayer rule should bar Narcy’s heirs from receiving the inheritance the court looked to In re Estate of Benson, 548 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:43 am
" Now, there's this defense from Michael Cohen, special counsel at The Trump Organization:“You’re talking about the frontrunner for the GOP, presidential candidate, as well as a private individual who never raped anybody. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm
The challenges to the efficiency of women’s work, full equality and collective childcare as well as the narrative of freedom and choice which became prominent in transition, were in some cases a re-occurrence, in some cases a continuation, of the debates which led to the Prague Spring of 1968. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm by Mike Gousha
Past polls have also shown majority support for repealing the state’s same-sex marriage ban. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:20 am by Mary Zambreno
Based upon Iowa’s long-standing recognition of common law marriages for well over a century, Goldie and Kurt may not need that formal marriage ceremony because they may already be married under Iowa law. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
Yet, under plaintiff’s interpretation of the Establishment Clause, these well-established exemptions, as well as many others, would all be constitutionally suspect examples of government preference for religion. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 7:11 pm by Juan Antunez
Ultimately, the Fourth Judicial Circuit Court entered a final judgment in In re Estate of Shelton, Case No.2006–CP–1845 (the Shelton case), which annulled the marriage between Shelton and Rhoualmi . . . [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 3:02 am by familoo
Proceedings for example under the 1989 Act, the Family Law Act 1986 or the Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985 may well provide an appropriate remedy rather than an application under the inherent jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Full story: The Telegraph.Life after family break-up: research challenges law change proposalGovernment plans to amend the 1989 Children Act by introducing a presumption of shared parenting are well-intentioned but misguided, say the authors of new research into childhood experience of family break-ups. [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:48 am by Stephen Page
I recently delivered a seminar for Australia's CEO Challenge about the Family Violence Bill amendments to the Family Law Act.Since 1985, I have helped thousands of clients with their domestic violence issues.Here is my paper:Family Violence Bill 2011By Stephen PageHarrington Family Lawyers[1]Australia’s CEO Challenge 14 May, 2012Family Law Act AmendmentsThe Family Law Legislation Amendment (Family Violence and Other Measures) Act 2011 received royal assent on 7 December 2011. [read post]