Search for: "In re McConnell"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
But this can’t be the discussion without it devolving into a frenzy of cries of “racist” if you’re white or “coon” if you’re black. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 5:07 pm
Gonzalez to Professor and former judge Michael McConnell, former attorney general Michael Mukasey, and former solicitors general Ted Olson and Ken Starr. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
. 'But now we’re a decade down the road, and the road is surrounded by floods and fires in a way that is becoming more and more visible.'... [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 6:53 pm
“This is too close for comfort,” McConnell said Tuesday. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 3:17 pm
But, as I say, it's so much easier to despise McConnell and profess one's love for the Constitution. [read post]
30 Dec 2017, 10:56 am
The Commission is not just (sotto voce) condemning Mitch McConnell. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 11:30 am
The case is In re McConnell, Case No. 19-67128-pwb, 2021 WL 203331 (Bankr. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:25 am
Senator Joe Lieberman (I-Connecticut] pressed McConnell on the subject Monday: McConnell [The Protect America Act] was passed, as you well know, and we're very pleased with that. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:40 am
If his vote contributes to the defeat of Schumer’s filibuster, he’ll anger Democrats, but he could also increase his re-election chances. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 12:29 pm
McConnell heads to court July 20 in Johnstown. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 6:09 am
It sailed through the Senate 69–30 in early August (including with a yes from Minority Leader Mitch McConnell), and has the support of business groups such as the Business Roundtable and the Chamber of Commerce. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 5:51 am
Now that we're in the nuclear age, when it's time for the next SCOTUS nominee's confirmation hearings, Senator Orrin Hatch "expect[s] Armageddon. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 5:48 am
They're like death-to-America Iranian hardliners.And then along comes Chuck, screwing up the big man's polemic. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 5:36 am
" At least they're trying. [read post]
27 May 2020, 11:00 am
Let's just say they're a publisher and to hell with it. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:34 pm
Senator McConnell's extension passed the Senate without debate. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 9:41 am
Although Section 215 and the two other provisions have expired, that doesn’t mean they’re gone forever. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 3:00 pm
" It's not a sex crime case, or other situation in which we're typically hesitant to identify the victim. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
There's no good reason to palm off responsibility to them as though they're some sort of oracle of truth. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
Wyden and Biden failed in 2021, and they're about to face a divided Congress at best in 2023. [read post]
