Search for: "In re McCreary" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2011, 4:56 pm by Colin O'Keefe
AT&T Inc. as Richard Renner, Richard Santalesa and Mark McCreary weigh in. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
On March 6, 2017, President Trump issued a new executive order on immigration that superseded an order he signed on January 27. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:53 am
Dos Passos 42nd Parallel i. 102 Say, yous guys, this is fellowworker McCreary....1993 M. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:19 pm by Colin O'Keefe
For the second day in a row this is a little bit later than normal, but as a result of that and wanting to provide ample coverage to two big legal developments, we're expanding today's roundup to 16 posts. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 9:54 am by Mark G. McCreary
I reached out to Mark McCreary who specializes in cybersecurity law and is the firm’s Co-Chair of the Privacy & Data Security Practice. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:09 am by Sam E. Antar
CNBC Senior Stock Commentator Herb Greenberg wrote in his blog that:My take: I generally ignore class action lawsuits, but they're hard to dismiss out of hand when they include allegations from multiple former employees.Is M. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 11:54 am by Lisa A. Mazzie
Those who take notes on a laptop may want to try what Professor Jana McCreary has called “a laptop vacation. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 7:09 am
"Sekulow replies that the display is 100 percent Establishment Clause kosher in light of [Van Orden and its companion case McCreary]. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 10:27 am
  Justice Scalia actually put it at the beginning of his McCreary County dissent (one of the Ten Commandments cases) a couple of years ago. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:40 pm by Kevin Funnell
Smith, the president of Gerrish McCreary Smith, a law and consulting firm in Memphis, predicted consolidation will claim 2,000 to 2,500 banks, bringing the nation's total to 6,000 or fewer. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
This post will highlight five of the government’s leading arguments: (1) that the court should apply a “presumption of regularity” to this case; (2) that because of Trump’s oath of office, courts should discount prior statements made on the campaign trail; (3) that when Trump said “we all know what that means,” he was not referring to the Muslim ban; (4) that Lemon and McCreary County should be cabined as “domestic” Establishment Clause cases;… [read post]