Search for: "In re Midkiff"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2010, 4:34 am
I’m assuming that the rule originally applied only to documents because they’re the only thing that could be copied in the 18th century, when the rule emerged. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:44 pm
We're starting to appreciate the Chief's "functional" approach. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 2:01 am
But in the 40-plus years since the RSL's initial adoption (and serial re-adoptions) the vacancy rate has never been north of 5%, and the promised transition to a free market and new construction didn't happen either. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 9:57 pm
Instead, Blackboard.com bucked the trend and opted for full freedom: by offering CC-BY, they're encouraging users to choose a truly Free Culture license. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 12:18 am
Epps' piece, especially his conclusion (we're sorry, eminent domain abuse, as bad as it is, is not quite as bad as concluding that a class of people are simply incapable of being citizens because they are somehow lesser humans -- that's just repugnant), we don't buy in wholly to his reasoning. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:51 am
Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229, 240 (Haw. 1984) 5. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
The Interplay between the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause: Is the Supreme Court’s Test for “Public Use” Merely Rational Basis? [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:39 am
Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229 (1984), the case that upheld the Hawaii Land Reform Act as a constitutional exercise of the State's eminent domain power. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 10:12 pm
We're betting that the project starts right up again. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 6:26 am
. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Aloha, I bring you greetings from the land of Midkiff, the land of Lingle. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
Ed. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:41 am
Facing long-standing U S Supreme Court decisions – Berman and Midkiff – that had settled US law in affirming ED4ED, including the right of local agencies forcibly to take property from one private landowner so they could sell it to another – the I4J set out to change law by changing policy by changing public awareness of the consequences of settled law. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
We’re not sorry to see you go Justice Douglas was doing more than penning a manifesto. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 6:34 am
Facing long-standing U S Supreme Court decisions – Berman and Midkiff – that had settled US law in affirming ED4ED, including the right of local agencies forcibly to take property from one private landowner so they could sell it to another – the I4J set out to change law by changing policy by changing public awareness of the consequences of settled law. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 11:40 am
Some of his works are under restrictive licenses, others are not; you'll have to look for yourself and figure out what amount of legal risk you're willing to take (that's just one of the burdens copyright law places on remixers). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Aug. 12, 2021) (quoting In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136 (1955)). [read post]
