Search for: "In re Morales (1981)" Results 101 - 120 of 178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Lovechilde
"  The first AIDS cases surfaced in 1981. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Quote of the Month (QOTM): The Angry Mob blog on the tabloid treatment of Christopher Jefferies: “Recent events have demonstrated once again that the tabloid media have no morals, no integrity and absolutely no journalistic values between them”. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
In the United Kingdom and other Council of Europe member states, following the 1981 decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Dudgeon v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
I quote below the body of the argument in the brief, minus the footnotes; but if you’re interested in the issue, you might just want to read the PDF. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:06 am by Mandelman
  And our policy makers become pious and smug as they ‘tut-tut’ about the “moral hazard” involved in bailing out these “irresponsible borrowers,” as if doing so would only encourage this same sort of distasteful behavior in the future. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:51 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
His research has ranged over a number of fields in economics, philosophy, and decision theory, including social choice theory, welfare economics, theory of measurement, development economics, public health, gender studies, moral and political philosophy, and the economics of peace and war. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:06 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  This could amount to a contempt of court but the journalist would be able to argue section 10 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 11:53 am
His research has ranged over a number of fields in economics, philosophy, and decision theory, including social choice theory, welfare economics, theory of measurement, development economics, public health, gender studies, moral and political philosophy, and the economics of peace and war. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But lots of pornographers use copyright extensively, and they’re a whole lot better at extracting money than the music industry because of the power of shaming: someone who downloads 1000 Britney Spears songs has no taste, but someone who downloads a hundred porn films, especially if they suggest racial or other taboos, is really threatened in his social existence if that were publicized. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 11:34 am by Jeff Gamso
Judge Segrest was facing re-election at the time of sentencing, and he overrode the jury’s verdict. in open court, he explained that he sentenced Mr. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:52 pm
The Episcopal Church doesn’t have a ‘one strike and you’re out’ policy, so it didn’t seem like I was any particular threat. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 7:23 am
Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, in his dissent in Professor Anastaplo’s case seeking admission to the Illinois Bar (In Re Anastaplo 1961—which Anastaplo lost 5-4), vigorously defended Anastaplo’s position on first amendment grounds and asserted, among other things, that “we must not be afraid to be free”—Justice Black arranged for this quote, and others from his dissent, to be read at his funeral. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:03 am by José Guillermo
Este es el único cardinal que se ocupa de las quejas, bueno es recordar que como el Decreto Legislativo Nº 052 data de marzo del año 1981 y se aplica hasta la actualidad sin modificaciones (el artículo) no obstante las sustantivas reformas al Procedimiento Procesal Penal, el Fiscal “Jefe inmediato en este artículo” vendría a ser el Superior en grado. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:35 am by admin
For children, he added, ”they’re like a jungle gym. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:56 am by The Legal Blog
The Bench as well as the Bar has to avoid unwarranted situations or trivial issues that hamper the cause of justice and are in the interest of none.17) In the case of Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate, In Re: , (1998) 7 SCC 248, the advocate was charged of criminal contempt of Court for the use of intemperate language and casting unwarranted aspersions on various judicial officers and attributing motives to them while discharging their judicial functions. [read post]