Search for: "In re Morales (1981)" Results 141 - 160 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the 1975 Ontario judgment Re Brown, (1975), 9 O.R. (2d) 185 at 192 (Ont. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the following cases for the upcoming term. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:05 pm by Bill Marler
Cir. 1981) (“an agency must receive and respond to petitions for rulemaking”); Nat’l Parks Conserv. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
The judge sought to cure the perceived deficiencies of the first order by issuing further orders of future disparagement (orders) which stated in relevant part: “1) Until the parties have no common children under the age of [fourteen] years old, neither party shall post on any social *660 media or other Internet medium any disparagement of the other party when such disparagement consists of comments about the party’s morality, parenting of or ability to parent any minor… [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Quote of the Month (QOTM): The Angry Mob blog on the tabloid treatment of Christopher Jefferies: “Recent events have demonstrated once again that the tabloid media have no morals, no integrity and absolutely no journalistic values between them”. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
Georgia, the ACLU continues to oppose capital punishment on moral and practical, as well as on constitutional, grounds: Capital punishment is cruel and unusual. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:21 am
I was the oldest of 3 boys, all 3 years apart, and we were raised by great parents who gave us love and morals, 24/7, and discipline when needed. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
December 15, 2008)(Unpub)Affirming race (B)/failure-to-hire §1981 claim 6th Circuit [Thanks to Sixth Circuit Cases] Trout v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
by Sandra Babcock; Human Rights / American Bar Association; November 04, 2007The debate over capital punishment in the United States--be it in the courts, in state legislatures, or on nationally televised talk shows--is always fraught with emotion. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
However, recent studies which indicate the existence of the endowment effect have lead many scholars to re-examine their initial assumptions regarding the importance initial entitlement.[2] II. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
by Sandra Babcock; Human Rights / American Bar Association; November 04, 2007The debate over capital punishment in the United States--be it in the courts, in state legislatures, or on nationally televised talk shows--is always fraught with emotion. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Southwestern Bell TelephoneState RoundupALNEWS · More on civil contempt proceeding to enforce 1981 consent decree vs Jefferson Cnty re hiring of Blacks and femsCADECIDED[12-19] St Ct App reinstates fired 65yo Sonoma County Superior Court Commish's age discrim claim; noted here; herePrivacy Rights Do Not Trump Plaintiffs' Right to Statistical DataFILEDDell layoffs lead to class action suit for age/gender discrim Fired blind-eyed Kern Cnty firefighter files… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:06 am by Mandelman
  And our policy makers become pious and smug as they ‘tut-tut’ about the “moral hazard” involved in bailing out these “irresponsible borrowers,” as if doing so would only encourage this same sort of distasteful behavior in the future. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
According to one press report, Angel Diaz "appeared to be moving 24 minutes after the first injection, grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and appearing to mouth words". [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:50 pm by David Kris
The precise meaning of the “fully and currently informed” standard has been worked out by accommodation between the branches of government over time, but according to one account from a knowledgeable insider, “[b]y the time Ronald Reagan was inaugurated as President in 1981, working relations between the oversight committees and the agencies they oversaw were reasonably well established. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:12 am
__________Under the leadership of Comrade Deng Xiaoping and the support of the older generation of revolutionaries, the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee of the Communist Party of China broke the heavy shackles of long-lasting “left” mistakes; criticized the wrong direction of the “Two Whatevers”; fully affirmed the scientific system of Mao Zedong Thought that must be completed and accurately mastered; gave a high appraisal the discussion on the problem… [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:56 am by The Legal Blog
The Bench as well as the Bar has to avoid unwarranted situations or trivial issues that hamper the cause of justice and are in the interest of none.17) In the case of Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate, In Re: , (1998) 7 SCC 248, the advocate was charged of criminal contempt of Court for the use of intemperate language and casting unwarranted aspersions on various judicial officers and attributing motives to them while discharging their judicial functions. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
I quote below the body of the argument in the brief, minus the footnotes; but if you’re interested in the issue, you might just want to read the PDF. [read post]