Search for: "In re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation" Results 41 - 60 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2016, 12:10 pm by Andrew Crocker and Karen Gullo
  Related Cases: National Security Letters (NSLs)In re: National Security Letter 2011 (11-2173)In re National Security Letter 2013 (13-80089)In re National Security Letter 2013 (13-1165)2016 Internet Archive NSLShare this: Join EFF [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The SEC subsequently mandated that publicly traded U.S. companies submit various periodic reports to the agency in a timely fashion, including an annual financial report. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  The U.S. itself takes exactly the same position with respect to grand jury subpoenas compelling production of records stored abroad, and (as discussed below) with respect to the SCA provisions compelling production of email data stored abroad. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
Intro: Mass Surveillance by NSA, GCHQ and Others  The National Security Agency is working to collect as much as possible about the digital lives of people worldwide. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm by Carrie Cordero
Outlawing bulk collection under multiple statutory provisions may very well clash with national security imperatives in the future. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 4:14 pm by Kurt Opsahl and Rainey Reitman
It increases protections designed to limit the potential harm from the use of National Security Letters (NSLs). [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 7:08 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Last but not least, the legislation would sunset authorization for National Security Letters in June 2015; and realign the FISA reauthorization with much of the Patriot Act, thus allowing Congress to debate these programs all at once. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Environmental Protection Agency 12-1484Issue: (1) Whether, contrary to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:13 am by David Kravets
A federal judge found in 2010 that two American lawyers’ telephone conversations with their clients in Saudi Arabia in 2004 were siphoned to the National Security Agency without warrants. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:32 am by Jay Stanley
They don’t apply to the Department of Homeland Security at all, and so agencies within that department, such as the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, don’t have to report anything. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:30 pm by Paul Jacobson
Each of the major banks has a set of terms and conditions and we reviewed ABSA's, First National Bank's, Nedbank's and Standard Bank's terms and conditions to determine to what extent users may be covered in the event of an exploit or other fraudulent or criminal activity. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:30 am by Maxwell Kennerly
In short, under National Muffler, it matters when and why an agency interpreted the statute a particular way (and if the agency had been taking inconsistent positions in the past), whereas under Chevron neither of those issues matter. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:38 am by Transplanted Lawyer
  The formal opinion isn't available yet from the Northern District's website, but watch for it here, under case number CV 06-01791, In Re: Nat'l Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 10:27 am
Barack Obama voted for the immunity package, which forced a San Francisco federal judge to dismiss an Electronic Frontier Foundation lawsuit targeting the nation's telecoms, accusing them of illegally funneling all electronic communications to the National Security Agency without warrants. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 4:48 am
Today, we look at In re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation, MDL No. 06-1791. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 4:33 am
The ruling: In Re: National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation. [read post]