Search for: "In re NonTestimonial Identification Order"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2023, 7:40 am
When is a Nontestimonial Identification Order Required? [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:01 am
By contrast, it is clear that an officer may not seek a nontestimonial identification order, G.S. 15A-271 (providing that an order may be issued “upon the request of a prosecutor”), or a wiretap order, G.S. 15A-291 (requiring the Attorney General or his or her designee to seek an order). [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 1:15 pm
Looking at G.S. 132-1.4(k) opens up a broader body of case law regarding the sealing of other types of public records, including returned search warrants and nontestimonial identifications orders. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:35 pm
Therefore, a nontestimonial identification order is not needed. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:53 am
In addition, the following court records are public and may be withheld only when sealed by court order: arrest and search warrants that have been returned by law enforcement agencies, indictments, criminal summons, and nontestimonial identification orders. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
§ 15A-302, nontestimonial identification orders, id. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:48 pm
These topics include: nontestimonial identification orders in juvenile cases, impaired driving investigations involving juveniles, and confidentiality of juvenile investigations. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:37 am
Juvenile Photographs at Show-ups Generally, nontestimonial identification procedures cannot be used with juveniles absent a court order or express statutory authorization. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:49 pm
Many of his inflammatory public statements, Nifong contends, were "consistent with matters of public record as outlined in the affidavit attached to the Application for Nontestimonial Identification Order. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:08 pm
After juvenile petitions were later brought, a judge issued a nontestimonial identification order under G.S. 7A-598 (now, G.S. 7B-2105) to take the juvenile’s fingerprints. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Yesterday, author William D. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Wecht, No. 07-4767 In a trial accusing a public official of misusing his office for private financial gain, an order to withhold from the public the names and addresses of prospective and trial jurors is vacated where: 1) the collateral order doctrine granted jurisdiction to hear the appeal; 2) intervenors-media companies had standing to challenge the order; 3) there is a presumptive First Amendment right to obtain the names of jurors prior to empanelment, which was not… [read post]
