Search for: "In re Opinion of the Judges" Results 1 - 20 of 18,986
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 4:23 am
In re TransAd, Inc., Serial No. 90877894 (April 25, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Mark A. [read post]
2 May 2024, 8:08 am by Kalvis Golde
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
 The opinion by Judge Prost rejected Zebra’s argument that Main Street had the exclusive ability to license the ‘247 patent upon OnAsset’s default. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:57 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Ultimately, an immigration judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals determined that Sanchez-Perez could not seek cancellation of removal due to this conviction. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 11:30 am
I've got no complaint with Judge Ikuta's opinion, which seems doctrinally correct. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
Egilman’s participation in an unlawful conspiracy was carefully detailed in an opinion by the presiding judge, Hon. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:04 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Opinion Columnist Robin Abcarian After 50 years as director of the Rape Treatment Center at UCLA Santa Monica Medical Center, she recently stepped down. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
In re Melapreneur, Serial No. 90858280 (April 15, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm by Mark Walsh
There are no opinions or bar admissions as preliminaries. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:07 pm by Ben Sperry
There, in the USTelecom opinion, concurring in the denial of rehearing by Judge Sri Srinivasan, the court found that the 2015 Open Internet Order was constitutional under the First Amendment, because it was only aimed at ISPs that hold themselves out as a “neutral, indiscriminate pathway” and not to those “making [it] sufficiently clear to potential customers that it provides a filtered service involving the ISP’s exercise of ‘editorial discretion. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:39 am
LLC, Serial No. 97444092 (April 23, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Mark A. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
If you do, you’re much less likely to miss a big topic or doctrine the professor was trying to get you to think about in a particular exam question. [read post]