Search for: "In re P. I. (1989)"
Results 1 - 20
of 453
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm
Section 98 of the Children Act 1989 (the 1989 Act) is one of several provisions that languish towards the tail end of the Act, often forgotten or misremembered in its precise effect by busy practitioners – and it has a tendency to emerge as relevant with little warning. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:46 am
I just re-read this, and was startled both by how well written it is (even better than I remembered), and by how fresh the observations and analysis remain. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 12:56 pm
P. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:41 pm
ADDENDUM: In the comments, Banksy (or someone impersonating him) writes: “You’re an idiot. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
P. 27. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 12:35 am
(Slip op., at p. 7.) [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:24 am
I have been doing e-discovery, nee litigation support, since 1989. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 9:04 am
As I was leisurely re-reading this case I was struck by the appellate court’s interpretation of the covenants dealing with the heart of the lawsuit. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm
A lot has happened since Monday night, when I posted a blog on the case which we now know as Re P (A Child). [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Sir Andrew McFarlane P ruled that: ‘…in the wholly unusual circumstances of this case, I consider that widespread media publicity with the aim of presenting the facts as found by a judge in a court of law is a necessary step in order to meet the private and family life needs of the mother and the children. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 1:03 pm
“ Re P is not to be entirely abandoned however. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm
In I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 2:37 am
The post UNDERSTANDING PARENTAL ALIENATION: WILL I LOSE MY CHILD IF ALLEGATIONS OF PARENTAL ALIENATION ARE ACCEPTED? [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
I-15: Lynch’s Estate; and MacIntyre Estate, Re (1989), 92 N.S.R. (2d) 110 (Prob. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
If you’re unfamiliar with the name Kunstler, you might have heard of some of the people he represented: revolutionaries who protested at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago; inmates who started an infamous riot at Attica prison in New York in 1971; the American Indian Movement members who demonstrated at Wounded Knee, S.D., in 1973; a man convicted of and later exonerated for allegedly beating and raping a jogger in Central Park in 1989; a house cat named… [read post]
Will Teamsters' Supreme Court of Canada Employment Law Victory Erode Employee Rights on Termination?
5 May 2008, 3:30 pm
MacMillan Bathurst Inc. 1989 CanLII 260 (ON C.A.), (1989), 70 O.R. (2d) 701). [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:54 am
P. 41(e) (1989)). [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:30 am
K-Mart Corp., 1989 OK 22, 770 P.2d 24.In Burk, the Oklahoma Supreme Court decided that some employer actions fall outside of the normal at-will protections in cases where the employment discharge is "contrary to a clear mandate of public policy. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 3:52 pm
App. 527, 530, 768 P.2d 530 (1989) (quoting David Boerner, Sentencing in Washington, § 4.5 (1985)). [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:30 am
P. 12. [read post]
