Search for: "In re Parenting of L.R."
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2012, 1:53 pm
Walters, L.R. 7 Ch. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:28 pm
I/M/O W.R. and L.R. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 1:30 pm
L.R. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:07 am
In re E.R.is a great example of an effective intro. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:13 am
We’ll give one example of what we’re talking about. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 5:35 pm
South Florida—I was five when my parents and I moved here from Brooklyn. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 5:35 pm
South Florida—I was five when my parents and I moved here from Brooklyn. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
L.R. (6th) 1, at para. 20, per Pentelechuk J.A.). [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm
Because he did not confirm the gift to his parents, Mr. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:13 am
I do not believe that this reflects the reality for most parents who choose to withdraw from the paid workforce to raise children, or choose to take part-time work in preference to full-time work. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
STERN v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:23 pm
While 'stare decisis furnishes almost the same advantages as a class action', Weinstein, Revision of Procedure: Some Problems in Class Actions, 9 Buffalo L.R. 433, 446, there is an important difference: '* * * the Stare decisis doctrine is an elastic one allowing the litigant to challenge the soundness of an outstanding decision whereas, under the doctrine of Res judicata, the decision is binding even though it is plainly wrong', It is precisely this difference… [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:41 pm
While 'stare decisis furnishes almost the same advantages as a class action', Weinstein, Revision of Procedure: Some Problems in Class Actions, 9 Buffalo L.R. 433, 446, there is an important difference: '* * * the Stare decisis doctrine is an elastic one allowing the litigant to challenge the soundness of an outstanding decision whereas, under the doctrine of Res judicata, the decision is binding even though it is plainly wrong', It is precisely this difference… [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 5:35 pm
South Florida—I was five when my parents and I moved here from Brooklyn. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
L.R. (6th) 26, rev’d on other grounds 2018 SCC 21, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 633, but disagreed on their application. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
