Search for: "In re Planned Parenthood Federation of America"
Results 61 - 80
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Wade and its companion 1992 decision Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Respect Life of South San Francisco (“Petitioners”) challenged the City of South San Francisco’s approval of a conditional use permit (“CUP”) for a proposed Planned Parenthood clinic at an existing office building in the city’s downtown. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Respect Life of South San Francisco (“Petitioners”) challenged the City of South San Francisco’s approval of a conditional use permit (“CUP”) for a proposed Planned Parenthood clinic at an existing office building in the city’s downtown. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
Wholly apart from the fact that the acronym for the petitioner’s name sounds eerily like the single worst cartoon character of all time, that four-time relist concerns a FOIA request for records related to a government grant to Planned Parenthood. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 3:42 pm
Per the attorney for Planned Parenthood of Alaska, Jeff Feldman, "very few minors find themselves in this situation," Those that do often come "from difficult or troubled families, where maybe the father or stepfather is the father... [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
The petitioners argued that there were unusual circumstances due to “the inherently noxious and controversial nature of a portion of Planned Parenthood’s services” which would cause significant environme [read post]
29 May 2011, 3:01 pm
School, ACLU Agree on Graduation Location Texas Minister Wins Fight Over Memorial Day Prayer Dems Warn Against Cutting Planned Parenthood California Assembly Votes to Limit Immigration Checks Now let’s see if MSNBC is covering the same events as National News… A New Darfur? [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Some states adopted a ban on this method, and Congress eventually adopted a federal ban in 2003.The Supreme Court upheld the federal ban in Gonzales v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
But just three months ago, Federal District Court Judge Jack B. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
The Federal Circuit sided with the VA. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 1:36 pm
In 1992, the Supreme Court reviewed its Roe ruling, in the case of Planned Parenthood of Southern PA v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 5:00 pm
Christie also notes that New Jersey eliminated funding for Planned Parenthood – something he says others talk about but haven’t done. 10:27 p.m. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Solum is one of America’s leading theorists of originalism. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
In a 1995 case, In re Custody of H.S.H. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Clearly, traditional notions of the family must be re-examined in the search for rational and equitable social and legal policies. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Nixon, No. 07-1295 In an action challenging a Missouri statute which criminalizes picketing in front of a funeral location or procession, denial of a preliminary injunction while the statute's constitutionality is reviewed is reversed where, incorporating the modified standard articulated in Planned Parenthood Minn., N.D., S.D. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 1:34 am
My first guest today is Rich Vaughn, who is a dear friend of mine and a colleague and is also practising as one of America’s leading fertility lawyers. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 1:34 am
My first guest today is Rich Vaughn, who is a dear friend of mine and a colleague and is also practising as one of America’s leading fertility lawyers. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Planned Parenthood Struck down a Maine ban on public funding availability for religious schools Ruled that prayer in school is protected under the First Amendment Ruled that police who fail to advise people of Miranda rights can’t be sued under civil rights law Struck down a New York law restricting the right to carry concealed weapons Expanded the power of individual states to prosecute crimes on tribal lands Reinstated a congressional map in Louisiana challenged for… [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Of course, whether reliance and causation are elements of a UCL claim is an unresolved question that the Supreme Court is expected to address in In re Tobacco and Pfizer. [read post]
