Search for: "In re Pohl" Results 1 - 20 of 226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Susanne Pohl-Zucker, independent researcher has published Making Manslaughter: Process, Punishment and Restitution in Württemberg and Zurich, 1376-1700 with Brill. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:43 am by Matt Danzer
 So why does the government oppose Judge Pohl’s severance order? [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:37 am by Wells Bennett
 The latter ought to be called to testify, too, given the circumstances surrounding Judge Pohl’s re-appointment—and a letter MacDonald apparently wrote, which spoke approvingly of Judge Pohl. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
We’re only after generic identification, Kammen argues. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 11:28 pm
"We're not losing a partner but gaining a client. [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:21 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Request noted, and we’re back to the right to counsel. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:32 am by Yishai Schwartz, Quinta Jurecic
” The discussion quickly becomes metaphysical: MJ [COL POHL]: If they're not in writing, how do your clients know what they say? [read post]
5 May 2012, 8:15 am by Benjamin Wittes
When you make motion, if you want to go back and say that I should have considered it earlier, you’re free to do that. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 12:44 pm by Cody M. Poplin
If the court were to release the transcript, the government could utilize Bin Attash’s thought process “in a prosecution where they’re seeking to kill him. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:50 pm by Zack Bluestone
On Tuesday, Judge Pohl issued a conduct order to defense counsel, detailing the advice he would give a detainee on the benefits and drawbacks of self-representation. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:50 pm by Zack Bluestone
On Tuesday, Judge Pohl issued a conduct order to defense counsel, detailing the advice he would give a detainee on the benefits and drawbacks of self-representation. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 1:03 pm
BELOW THE LINE DEBTOR MUST RUN 36 MONTHS In re Pohl, Case No. 06-41236 May 2007, Judge Karlin The Court determined that a below the line debtor’s case must “run” 36 months, unless it pays off all claims in full, citing 1325(b)(4). [read post]