Search for: "In re R.C." Results 61 - 80 of 302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2014, 4:40 am by Jon Hyman
Or, Ohio’s legislature can do right by our state’s employers and pass legislation ending this incorrect interpretation of R.C. 4112, which will bring Ohio into line with the discrimination laws of nearly every other state and Title VII. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm by Lisa Whittaker
The Supreme Court disagreed, concluding that: R.C. 4123.90 when viewed in conjunction with R.C.4123.95 and read in pari materia, places an implicit affirmative responsibility on an employer to provide its employee notice of the employee's discharge within a reasonable time after the discharge occurs in order to avoid impeding the discharged employee's 90-day notification obligation under R.C.4123.90. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:32 am by MBettman
Ohio 2013) (permitting the use of R.C. 2744.07(A)(2) as a private cause of action for a judgment creditor to pursue indemnification from an employer.) [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:07 am by MBettman
In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970) (the prosecution must prove every element of a crime “beyond a reasonable doubt” for the defendant to be convicted.) [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am by MBettman
  They then re-filed their claims against Delaware Grace and Darrell Anderson in the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:04 am by MBettman
These blog cases are still out: In re: (C.C.S.), (C.L.S.) v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:49 am by Eugene Volokh
And the court distinguished In re Adoption of Ridenour (Ohio 1991), which held that: … R.C. 3107.15 reflects the legislature's intent to find families for children. [read post]