Search for: "In re R.C."
Results 161 - 180
of 302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
As I mentioned on Friday, there are few things more discouraging if you’re doing an appeal than completing your review of a lengthy trial transcript and realizing that the judge ran a clean trial. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 3:25 am
One in the head, now you’re dead. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:41 am
I’ve had trial judges grant them, but if the motion’s denied and you have to go up to the court of appeals, the deferential — some would call it obsequious — “abuse of discretion” standard kicks in, and you’re going to be hard-pressed to show that. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 9:35 am
In re Adoption of B.I.,2019-Ohio-2450. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
See Ohio R.C. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
R.C. 2950.99 (Penalty provisions for sexually oriented offenses.) [read post]
7 Jun 2006, 6:38 am
In re S.J.K.Summit App. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
IN RE THOMAS A jury found Appellant Thomas R. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:19 am
Juan wisely points out: Plaintiffs suing estates often fail to realize that they’re really litigating their claims in two separate courts in front of two separate judges: The trial court adjudicating their lawsuit (this is where the decedent’s liability is established); and The probate court administering the decedent’s probate estate (this is where you go to collect on your judgment) Ohio’s rules for presenting claims against an estate are found in… [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am
Final Appealable Order This case involves the category of orders under R.C. 2505.02(B) that “affect a substantial right made in a special proceeding. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 12:30 pm
In re D.H., Slip Opinion No. 2018-Ohio-17 (Juvenile court orders transferring jurisdiction to adult court are not final orders under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4).) [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 5:16 pm
We're talking bare possibility here, but in this case, that's enough.You see, back in 2007, in a case called State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm
Under Ohio Law (R.C. 4511.19[A][2]), a person with a prior O.V.I. conviction within 20 years who refuses the test is charged with a separate offense for refusing the test. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
Pennsylvania (1971) and this Court's holding in In re Agler (1969) that because the fundamental objectives of juvenile proceedings are different than those of an adult criminal prosecution, juvenile offenders do not have a constitutional right to have their cases decided by a jury. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:39 pm
They threatened a lawsuit against Calipari, Rose and U of M athletic director R.C. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:44 am
After spending the last few weeks listening to my whining about how they’re rendering so few decisions, the 8th decides to shut me up by issuing a bakers dozen of criminal cases. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
The inference is because an offender receives a quantity of drugs, that offender is inferred to have violated the elements of R.C. 2925.03(A)(2). [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
While non-judicial, residential evictions are prohibited by the Ohio Landlord Tenant Act (Section R.C. 5321.15(A), not so with commercial evictions. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
On June 9, 2008, when the matter was set for trial, Powell entered a plea of guilty to the charge of voyeurism, in violation of R.C. 2907.08(A), a misdemeanor of the third degree, in exchange for the dismissal of the remaining charges against him. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:27 am
Then, to justify the consecutive sentence it selected, the court must articulate why it made any of the conclusory findings it made, having reference to the policy purposes of felony sentencing in R.C. 2929.11 and the applicable seriousness and recidivism factors in R.C. 2929.12. [read post]
