Search for: "In re Randy R." Results 81 - 100 of 520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2014, 6:39 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Apologies for this going live a bit later than normal, but we’re here with today’s Top 10 nonetheless. [read post]
17 May 2017, 4:13 pm by David Lat
" [Guile is Good] * If you're a law student interested in ediscovery, check out this contest, sponsored by kCura. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:46 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Supreme Court season is in full swing and we’re seeing a lot of posts on oral arguments and rulling come across the wire on the LexBlog Network. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:07 pm by Joe Patrice
[Corporette] * If you’re representing a defense contractor, it’s a lot easier to export their wares these days. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 7:46 pm by Berin Szoka
And remember, we’re having a joint happy hour with the Electronic Frontier Foundation Wednesday evening, 5:30-8:30 at Johnny’s on the Half Shell on Capitol Hill. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:01 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Though we’re a couple days out from the decision we’re still seeing a posts coming in on the D.C. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:42 pm by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) Observers are anticipating a decision on the motion for summary judgment by Judge Henry Hudson in the Virginia AG’s challenge to the Affordable Care Act soon, perhaps next week — and perhaps in advance of Thursday morning’s oral arguments on the summary judgment motion in the 20 AG lawsuit in Florida. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
MITT ROMNEY (R): It's really quite a curious turn of events for him to start complaining about an activist court. [read post]
Originally introduced in 2013 by Representative Steve Stivers (R-Ohio), H.R. 957 was re-introduced in February 2015 as a bipartisan bill co-authored by Representatives Tim Walz (D-Minnesota) and Stivers. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 9:26 pm by Edward Smith
“Whatever they’re using is very corrosive,” said Randy Cagle. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 5:40 am by Randy Kozel
Of course we’re interested in new cases, but we’re also interested in the past: When a justice leaves the court and another arrives, what will remain settled and what will be up for grabs? [read post]