Search for: "In re Robert V. (1982)" Results 81 - 100 of 174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2015, 7:30 am by Jeff Welty
App. 671 (2003) (finding a fatal defect in an indictment charging a drug offense but noting that “[t]he State . . . may elect to re-indict defendant” using a proper pleading); United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 7:30 am by Jeff Welty
App. 671 (2003) (finding a fatal defect in an indictment charging a drug offense but noting that “[t]he State . . . may elect to re-indict defendant” using a proper pleading); United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
We're slamming someone on the open forum that is the internet. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am by Aaron L. Nielson
In In re Dolly Varden Chocolate Co., decided in 1924, the Court reiterated that “the words ‘Merrie Christmas’ [do] not to constitute a valid technical trade-mark for ribbon. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  South Carolina, for example, passed a law in 1882 that required all potential voters to re-register, but delegated to election administrators broad discretion in determining voting eligibility. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am by Matt Sundquist
”  And in 1982, in Globe Newspaper Co. v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:35 am by Eugene Volokh
It has been illegal for about a year, however, for Robert Serafinowicz to “Post[] any information, whether adverse or otherwise, pertaining to [Bernstein] on any website for any purpose. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am by Ron Coleman
Co., 213 USPQ 594 (TTAB 1982), aff’d, 703 F.2d 1372, 217 USPQ 505 (Fed. [read post]