Search for: "In re Ross" Results 121 - 140 of 2,178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
They start by turning associates loose, using ROSS just as they would other research tools (yes, Google and Wikipedia, you're included in that list). [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 5:01 am
 In the mean time, however, if you're thinking about switching your firm to a Mac, come on in! [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 5:25 am
    Gregg Ross # # # NY1 POLL: 76% SAY QUINN SHOULD NOT BE RE-ELECTED New York, NY. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:32 am
Brian Ross Reports on the D.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:32 pm
The John Ross and Atwater Place have not gone into default or foreclosure.... [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 5:30 pm by Joe Patrice
Bonus Roundup: MoFo, Munger, Susman, Ross Aronstam, Covington, and Cahill. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 8:56 pm by Sme
Ross (10th Cir., February 27, 2018) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the National Weather Service (Ross): Winston did not establish a prima facie discrimination or retaliation claim, protected activity did not cause the alleged retaliation and the incidents alleged did not amount to adverse employment action)WagesFernandez v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:03 pm by Ars Staff
In any event, you’ve opened the door to it, and we’re going to proceed. [read post]
31 May 2015, 5:00 am by David Kravets
We're talking about massive quantities of amphetamine, ecstasy, and cocaine to LSD and everything in between. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:17 pm
Atlantic.com: An Eye Without an 'I': Justice and the Rise of Automated Surveillance by Ross Andersen: Over the past decade, video surveillance has exploded. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 8:00 am
brings us a modified Kübler-Ross process, Iraq edition: 1. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
This means that “when the disposition of a case is based upon a lack of standing only, the lower courts have not yet considered the merits of the claim,” and the dismissal is “not intended to have any determinative effect ‘on the merits’ of the action” (Landau v LaRossa, Mitchell & Ross, 11 NY3d 8 [2008]). [read post]