Search for: "In re S.B." Results 201 - 220 of 309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2012, 6:15 am by Fred Campbell
” State Senator Alex Padilla, a San Fernando Democrat, introduced a bill (S.B. 1161) that would implement this policy in California. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:08 am by Jamison Koehler
  I reported last week on his successful appeal in In re S.B. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:14 am by Matt Brown
If you’re a cop, would you rather stop a white guy and either catch him committing a real crime or let him go with a ticket for whatever justified the stop, or would you rather stop someone who might not have adequate papers and spend the rest of your shift dealing with the consequences of a law you despise or at the very least believe someone else should be enforcing? [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:11 pm by Caitlin Padula
Be sure to check back in with us as we examine other cuts in S.B. 2840 and measure them against our three-part standard. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:58 am by Armen
  If you're a libertarian aching to claw back Congress's commerce clause authority to pre-New Deal days, this is your opinion. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 5:07 am by Jamison Koehler
Court of Appeals, In re S.B., ___ A.3d ___, ___ (D.C. 2012). [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:59 pm by Caitlin Padula
Of course, S.B. 2840 wasn’t the only health care related bill this session. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
Royal Dutch Petroleum, the case in which the Court heard oral argument earlier this year but then scheduled for re-argument again next Term. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:07 am by Joshua Matz
United States, the challenge to Arizona’s S.B. 1070 immigration law. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:53 am by SO Issues
“We want to make sure we’re proactive in making sure our children don’t go to the wrong door step,” Ovitt said. - Once again Big Brother trying to step in and run your life for you. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 3:23 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
"  Phase four ends with a naked power grab:  If you're a justice of the Supreme Court, decide that the police of any and all cities and towns and villages have the absolute authority to strip-search any person whom they, for whatever reason, put under arrest. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Joshua Matz
United States – the federal challenge to S.B. 1070, Arizona’s immigration law – remains the main subject of Court-related news. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:30 pm by Lyle Denniston
  So this is not a case about ethnic profiling.”  The Solicitor General answered: “We’re not making any allegation about racial or ethnic profiling in this case.” Although no observer could be sure what motivated Roberts to make that point, he was either trying to keep that question out of the case because it would remain an issue in lower courts, or else he was seeking to head off criticism that, if the Court did allow Arizona to enforce S.B.… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:50 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
“The law invites police to rely on their racial bias when deciding who to stop, so our skin color means we’re more likely to be targeted. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:24 pm by Suzanne Ito
Then, continuing his train of thought, Pearce illustrated by analogy why S.B. 1070's "show me your papers" rules are "common sense": "If I've got three kids in Sun City at 3 in the morning, I don't care what color they are, they're going to get stopped and questioned: kids don't live in Sun City [a retirement community] and 3 o'clock in the morning's another element. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Birkenfeld says that hasn’t happened yet, days after the deadline S.B. 1636 set for turning in all untested evidence. [read post]