Search for: "In re S.B." Results 101 - 120 of 309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2018, 12:45 pm by Jamie Williams
" We’re glad that Google plans to be build transparency into this technology. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:01 am by Stephanie Hoffer
 As long as we are re-upping this provision for Congressional consideration, why not add Americorp and Teach for America to it? [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 10:49 am by Katharine Trendacosta
S.B. 822 would make getting state money or using state resources contingent on the ISP adhering to net neutrality principles. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 11:45 am by Dave Maass
Nathan Deal to veto S.B. 315 as soon as it lands on his desk. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:23 pm by Jeffrey Carr
The simplest way of thinking of incorporation is that the courts tell states, “Hey, you’re not allowed to infringe on that right, in that way. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 10:40 am by Camille Ochoa
They’re focused on their main core interest, and they just probably haven’t considered some of the issues like S.B. 315. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 12:18 pm by Dave Maass
EFF supports S.B. 712, a California bill that would allow drivers to cover their plates when they’re parked. [read post]
If you’re interested in meeting to discuss your case, I can offer a free half-hour initial consultation to potential clients. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm
(See In re S.B. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1287, 1293, fn. 2.)Although the distinctions between waiver, estoppel, and forfeiture can be significant, the terms are not always used with care. [read post]