Search for: "In re S.B."
Results 121 - 140
of 309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2019, 2:06 pm
DONATE TO EFF Like what you're reading? [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 1:20 pm
Michelle Lujan Grisham signed S.B. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:21 am
They're going to be asking them if they have papers because of the color of their skin. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:38 am
"In light of the foregoing, we conclude that the United States has met its burden to show that there is likely no set of circumstances under which S.B. 1070 Section 6 would be valid, and it is likely to succeed on the merits of its challenge. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:25 am
You’re only an hour away and didn’t notice the speed limit was reduced to 65mph. [read post]
19 May 2016, 10:01 am
Consider the consequences of the opposite rule—one that would say you’re entitled to pension formulas that existed on the day you were hired. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 5:27 am
” That is, the re-creation of the chemicals from scratch in a lab? [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:17 am
In the challenge to S.B. 8, the United States has placed a lot of weight on In re Debs (1895). [read post]
6 May 2008, 10:00 am
INS, 213 F.3d 1179, 1186 (9th Cir. 2000); In re S.B., 639 N.W.2d 78, 83-84 (Neb. 2002); State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:10 am
” McAffrey’s S.B. 1872 would also attach a new $5 processing fee to the tickets, of which a portion would be shared with the ticketing officer’s department. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 5:36 pm
These cases held unconstitutional the state's restrictions on city residency requirements enacted by S.B. 82 in 2006. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 8:59 am
Res. 1180, introduced by Rep. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:53 am
“We want to make sure we’re proactive in making sure our children don’t go to the wrong door step,” Ovitt said. - Once again Big Brother trying to step in and run your life for you. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:06 pm
We're so busy talking about Kris Kobach's train wreck of a law, we have no time to treat the injured lying on both sides of the track. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 4:58 pm
Maxine Huff, et al. , a 9-page opinion on rehearing re an estate dispute, Judge Brown writes: We grant rehearing and revise our original opinion as set forth herein. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
The Court did not take center stage by deciding the constitutional challenges we are watching most closely: the cases involving the health care reform statute, Arizona’s S.B. 1070 immigration law, or the upcoming dispute on California’s Proposition 8 on gay marriage. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 3:22 am
” In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 866 F.3d 231, 233 (5th Cir. 2017). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:18 am
That could change soon: we're closely watching state-level legislation such as S.B. 573 that would create statewide rules for open data, including the creation of a formal Chief Data Officer position that would write formal open data guidelines in consultation with the attorney general. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:30 am
The governor must re-examine her support for Senate Bill 1070, which is nothing more than state-sanctioned discrimination. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:30 pm
So this is not a case about ethnic profiling.” The Solicitor General answered: “We’re not making any allegation about racial or ethnic profiling in this case.” Although no observer could be sure what motivated Roberts to make that point, he was either trying to keep that question out of the case because it would remain an issue in lower courts, or else he was seeking to head off criticism that, if the Court did allow Arizona to enforce S.B.… [read post]
