Search for: "In re S.C.R."
Results 41 - 60
of 256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2020, 4:00 am
New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9 (CanLII), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190: that judicial review functions to maintain the rule of law while giving effect to legislative intent. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9 (CanLII), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190: that judicial review functions to maintain the rule of law while giving effect to legislative intent. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 9:30 pm
The King, 1949 CanLII 50 (S.C.C.), [1949] S.C.R. 712, at p. 715, Rand J. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
How do you survive re-examination? [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
., [1929] S.C.R. 117, Bater v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:50 am
Colet, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 2). [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:54 am
It held that it was not open to the trial judge to review whether s. 213(1)(c) breaches s. 2(b) of the Charter because that issue was decided in Reference Re ss. 193 and 195.1(1)(c) of the Criminal Code (Man.), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1123. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 2:26 pm
Seiko, [1984] 1 S.C.R. 583 · Coca-Cola Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
Mack, 1988 CanLII 24 (SCC), [1988] 2 S.C.R. 903, at p. 961). [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
., 2009 SCC 61, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 640, at para. 2, per McLachlin C.J. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28 (CanLII), [2017] 1 S.C.R. 543, at para. 13; Mustapha v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 4:00 am
Ewanchuk, 1999 CanLII 711 (SCC), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 330, at para. 28. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 6:08 pm
In Re Balfour Estate(1990), 85 Sask. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:03 pm
We’re about five years away from a demographic tsunami—that forecast point in time when 25% of Canadians will be 65 or older. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:03 am
[83] The DAGC acknowledges that this duty, also known as the duty of utmost good faith or candour, applies to all of the Service’s ex parte proceedings before the Federal Court: Harkat (Re), 2010 FC 1243 at para 117, rev’d on other grounds 2012 FCA 122, appeal on reserve before the Supreme Court; Charkaoui (Re), 2004 FCA 421 at paras 153, 154; Almrei (Re), 2009 FC 1263, para 498. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:01 am
Golden, 2001 SCC 83, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 679. [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:36 pm
But the benefits you’re eligible to receive have been slashed significantly. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Saskatchewan, 2015 SCC 4 [1] In the Alberta Reference (Reference re Public Service Employee Relations Act (Alta.), 1987 CanLII 88 (SCC), [1987] 1 S.C.R. 313), this Court held that the freedom of association guaranteed under s. 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms did not protect the right to collective bargaining or to strike. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
Pan, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 344, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the jury secrecy provisions in section 649. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:01 am
Burns, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 656, at p. 665). [read post]
